· Private foundation
S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $12,500 |
| FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSIY | $7,000 |
| COLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $4,000 |
| PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| KS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL | $2,000 |
| KANSAS UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| STERLING COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HAYS ACADEMY OF HAIR DESIGN | $1,000 |
| PRATT COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSIY9× · 2017–2025 · $147k
- KSKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $67k
- NTNORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL8× · 2017–2025 · $24k
Funded once
- BUBAKER UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +9%
- SASALINA AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $3k
- HCHUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kcu is a community of professionals committed to excellence in the education of highly qualified students in osteopathic medicine, dental medicine and health professions.
Benedict college will be a power for good in society. the college is a full opportunity college with high quality programs of teaching, research, and public service. these programs provide the students and community with knowledge, skills,…
Columbia College improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Central college is a private liberal arts institution dedicated to the four year undergraduate experience.
Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.
Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.
Non-profit incorporated in nebraska that provides higher education services to adult students.
To provide an exceptional undergraduate liberal arts education.
To provide a culturally diverse student body with an education that achieves a balance among the humanities, the sciences and the professions.
To transform our students by providing the finest liberal arts education available, taught through the academically rigorous, immersive, and flexible block plan.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.
To provide students with a total educational experience of the highest quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany College and the most unlike its peers is Ottawa University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kansas Independent College Association · Jellison Benevolent Society Inc · The Pete Henry Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Rose Spurrier Scholarship Fund · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Bill & Julia Thomas Charitable Trust · The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2?
Find your warmest path to S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.