Skip to content
S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2022
31
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$7.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 17 organizations, $11M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

823
’17
846
’18
620
’19
6
’20
10
’21
17
’22
7
’23
6
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$61MInternational$6.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.5MCivil Rights$1.3MEducation$1.2MCommunity Improvement$836kHuman Services$823kFood & Nutrition$550kOther$0
02FY2022 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+4 grants · $8.4M
$125,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$227M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND$6,956,110
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERS USA$500,000
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$500,000
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$415,971
Individual grant recipient$200,000
AAPI CIVIC ENGAGEMENT FUND - NEO PHILANTHROPY INC$200,000
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW$200,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$200,000
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENCE AND EDUCATION FUND$200,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION$200,000
PROJECT HOPE$150,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$150,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$150,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$150,000
UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCRTHE UN REFUGEE AGENCY$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($69M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($9.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%I FOSTER INC: $2k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $4k → 11%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT INC: $2k → 8%BOMBAY TEEN CHALLENGE: $2k → 9%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $3k → 7%SOUTH BRUNSWICK SOCIAL SERVICES: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDRENS CENTER OF CLIFTON-PASSAIC INC: $2k → 12%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $3k → 7%YMCA OF METUCHEN NJ: $2k → 8%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 11%SUMMIT AREA YMCA: $3k → 10%MIXTECA ORGANIZATION: $10k → 20%BLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFITCORPORATION: $2k → 4%MIXTECA ORGANIZATION: $10k → 20%AABR INC: $6k → 13%FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC: $2k → 6%FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC: $2k → 6%FREEFROM: $250k → 14%READYKIDS INC: $2k → 8%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $9k → 13%FAMILY CENTER INC: $4k → 20%READYKIDS INC: $2k → 8%ASIAN WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONTCLAIR: $2k → 16%PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $3k → 7%HAVEN AT FIRST & MARKET INC: $2k → 8%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $2k → 8%LESBIAN AND GAY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER INC: $26k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $300k → 14%LESBIAN AND GAY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER INC: $26k → 17%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $75k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $2k → 8%NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $2k → 17%RESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $3k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $2k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $175k → 17%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $2k → 17%FRIENDS OF WHEELS: $3k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25k → 17%VISIONS SERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $8k → 17%VISIONS SERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%HARTLEY HOUSE: $18k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($9.6M)

24 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$6.7M · 82 grants
India$1.2M · 13 grants
Philippines$326k · 5 grants
Israel$275k · 2 grants
Canada$213k · 23 grants
Brazil$150k · 2 grants
Singapore$115k · 9 grants
Sweden$100k · 1 grant
OC$100k · 1 grant
Argentina$52k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 39% of S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 733 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

733 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2022, 719 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

733
1137

Total granted

$33M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+35%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +76%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +20%
  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $850k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $4.9M
  • UW
    UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $3.7M
  • UD
    UGA DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS-MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1483 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1483 of the 1,944 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
328
Early backer (in before they grew)
1430/1483
Grantees still filing
1139/1483
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $16,479,733 · OtherTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUNDUNITED KINGDOM ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $6,199,893 · OtherUNITED KINGDOM ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATIONTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND DONOR ADVISED FUND: $4,929,467 · OtherTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND DONOR ADVISED FUNDUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $3,700,663 · OtherUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE DONOR ADVISED FUND+105 more: $6,429,101 · Other+105 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $26,203,911 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $2,703,618 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE+8 more: $260,632 · PhilanthropyUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,667,200 · InternationalUNITED ST…DIRECT RELIEF: $1,275,000 · InternationalDIRECT RE…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 · InternationalPROJECT H…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $512,305 · InternationalMEDECINS …GIVE2ASIA: $475,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIAMYRIAD USA INC: $378,750 · InternationalMYRIAD US…International Rescue Committee INC: $259,758 · International+17 more: $1,261,986 · International+17 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $537,000 · Human ServicesFreefrom: $250,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $75,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesLesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc: $52,300 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $52,100 · Human ServicesSIN BARRERAS WITHOUT BARRIERS INC: $50,000 · Human Services+5 more: $69,433 · Human ServicesNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $250,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $202,880 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $200,680 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $200,100 · Civil RightsMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $100,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $25,100 · Civil RightsUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $200,000 · EducationBUSINESS - HIGHER EDUCATION FORUM: $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $28,058 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $21,520 · EducationSOLDIER STRONG INC: $21,400 · EducationSIENA UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · Education+22 more: $182,194 · EducationCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $125,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $101,480 · Community ImprovementACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY: $18,700 · Community ImprovementThe Conference Board Inc: $16,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSTRYCKER'S BAY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL INC: $13,200 · Community Improvement
Other$37,738,857Philanthropy$29,168,161International$6,679,999Human Services$1,260,833Civil Rights$978,760Education$522,172Community Improvement$384,380

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $26,203,911 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $2,703,618 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,667,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,275,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $537,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $512,305 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $475,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $378,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $259,758 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $254,162 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFreefrom: $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $221,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $203,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $202,880 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $200,680 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $200,100 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $135,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASHOKA: $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $106,114 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $101,480 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS: $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROOTS: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $81,112 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICROFINANCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc: $52,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $52,100 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBUSINESS - HIGHER EDUCATION FORUM: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF FUNDACION CARDIOINFANTIL: $50,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON IMPACT INC: $38,707 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $32,326 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $28,554 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds Freefrom ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARDLY GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds US Chamber of Commerce Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …Perry Foundation IncThe Charles Fund IncThe J & E Berkley Fou…Oakwood Foundation Ch…Manning Family Founda…American Express Foun…The Genan FoundationThe Oak Hill FundCaplin FoundationThe Hyde and Watson F…Cassiopeia Foundation…
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA56.6× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The Charles Fund Inc · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Manning Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Genan Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund · Caplin Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Cassiopeia Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1944 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home