· Private foundation
S and H Korn Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bais Shmuel | $24,000 |
| Mesivta of Greater Miami | $17,000 |
| Kesser Malka | $17,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| West Side Kollel | $11,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,000 |
| Bais Menachem of North Miami Beach | $7,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
| Yeshiva Toras Chaim | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| Hachaim Vhasholom | $6,000 |
| Yeshiva of Far Rockaway | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.
55 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA6× · 2018–2023 · $58k · revenue +88%
- YUYESHIVA UNIVERSITY3× · 2019–2021 · $51k · revenue +31%
- DMDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC2× · 2022–2023 · $37k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $70k
- CYCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INCone grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue -54%
- RREKONECTone grant, 2021 · $40k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Provide support to further jewish education
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
How this is measured
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds REKONECT ↗
- Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
- Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Alternative Energy Foundation · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · The J W Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization S and H Korn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S and H Korn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
- Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on S and H Korn’s filings →