Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ryan Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$1.2MArts & Culture$210kInternational$75kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADNOR HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+1%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHIPLEY SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $170k · revenue +18%
  • WA
    WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $75k · revenue +85%
  • PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • EU
    EASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • Teach for America Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

2
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
10
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
11
Elysian Charter School of Hoboken

The elysian charter school offers an academic program to help children discover their talents.

Education
12
Rollins College

Education and Public Service Mission: Rollins College educates students for global citizenship and responsible leadership, empowering graduates to pursue meaningful lives and productive careers. We are committed to liberal arts ethos and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools and the most unlike its peers is Radnor High School Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARVARD COLLEGE — $801,082 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGEBENCHMARK SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $135,225 · OtherBENCHMARK SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more — $35,000 · OtherNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $160,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET DREAML…PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA ORC…THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DREAMYARD PR…SHIPLEY SCHOOL — $170,000 · EducationSHIPLEY SCHOO…BUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS — $10,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $10,000 · EducationWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA — $75,000 · InternationalHOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,146,307Arts & Culture$235,000Education$200,000International$75,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $170,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $160,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA — $75,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRadnor High School Scholarship Fund — $25,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ryan Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph