Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruxer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2023
30
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of Ruxer Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Dubois County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Ruxer Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $117k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
11
’18
9
’19
10
’20
10
’21
11
’22
11
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.3MReligion$387kHealth$117kAnimals$97kArts & Culture$69kRecreation & Sports$31kYouth Development$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k25 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$13,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
HOLY FAMILY CHURCH$10,000
ST MEINRAD SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$10,000
AMERICAN SADDLEBRED MUSEUM$7,500
SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT$7,000
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$5,000
DUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCEITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
VU JASPER FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WNIN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $4k → 5%STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $4k → 5%STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $4k → 5%STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $4k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$867k · 38 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
7

Total granted

$867k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+27%

Still filing today

26%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +36%
  • DC
    DUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +72%
  • STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • PE
    PURDUE EXTENSION VANDERBUGH COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CO
    CITY OF JASPER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
2
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana Historical Society

Since 1831, the indiana historical society has been indiana's storyteller, connecting people to the past by collecting, preserving, interpreting, and disseminating the state's history. a nonprofit membership organization, the ihs also…

Arts & Culture
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Visit Dubois County Inc

To promote conventions and tourism in Dubois County, Indiana

Community Improvement
7
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
9
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
12
Dubois County Museum Inc

To collect and preserve local history and items related thereto, and to provide education to the general public.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,260,256 · PhilanthropyDUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONST JOSEPH'S CHURCH: $159,034 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CHURCHHOLY FAMILY CHURCH: $80,034 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CHURCHST MEINRAD SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $64,534 · OtherST MEINRAD SCHOOL OF THEOLOGYIndividual grant recipient: $61,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN SADDLEBRED MUSEUM: $48,846 · OtherAMERICAN SADDLEBRED MUSEUMSISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $47,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST BENEDICTVU JASPER FOUNDATION: $32,000 · Other+32 more: $200,000 · Other+32 moreMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $82,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $13,000 · HealthDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $35,689 · AnimalsTRUE INNOCENTS EQUINE RESCUE (TIER): $5,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ARTS INC: $33,500 · Arts & CultureINDIANA BASEBALL HALL OF FAME INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesGATHER NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$1,260,256Other$692,448Health$95,000Animals$41,189Arts & Culture$40,500Human Services$15,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,260,256 over 1y, 10% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $82,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $35,689 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ARTS INC: $33,500 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetWNIN TRI-STATE PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $15,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS CHARITY HORSE SHOW IN: $7,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetINDIANA BASEBALL HALL OF FAME INC: $7,000 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetTRUE INNOCENTS EQUINE RESCUE (TIER): $5,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGATHER NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDUBOIS COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF SOUTHERN HILLS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetBUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WNIN TRI-STATE PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS CHARITY HORSE SHOW IN ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA BASEBALL HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE INNOCENTS EQUINE RESCUE (TIER) ↗
  • Who funds GATHER NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF SOUTHERN HILLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dubois County Community FoundationIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dubois County Community Foundation · Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc · Sanda Hills Equine Center Inc · Ken Krempp Foundation · The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruxer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruxer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruxer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph