Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ruth Warshaw Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$150kReligion$90kHealth$77kPhilanthropy$44kInternational$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$885k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VALERIE FUND$10,000
VALLEY CHABAD$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY$6,000
JEWISH HOME FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF NJ INC$6,000
E MOTION$2,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE OPPORTUNITY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NJ Y CAMPS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 10 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$336k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+31%

Still filing today

20%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HOME FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF NJ INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $112k
  • VC
    VALLEY CHABAD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k
  • TV
    THE VALERIE FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CW
    CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +192%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

2
Fund for New Jersey
3
Barry & Florence Friedberg Jewish Community Center Inc

The friedberg jewish community center promotes jewish life and values by providing programs and services in a warm and caring environment for all people in every stage of life. we build a community one member at a time.

Religion
4
Jewish Family Service & Children's Center of Clifton-Passaicinc

Jewish family service and children's center of clifton-passaic is a social services and mental health agency that seeks to enhance the lives of indiviuals and families. the organization offers psychotherapy, psychiatry, geriatric, crisis…

Human Services
5
Planned Lifetime Assistance Network of New Jersey

Planned lifetime assistance of new jersey (plan|nj), a nonprofit organization, helps the families of people with disabilities answer the question, "who will care for my loved one when i'm gone?" a person with intellectual, developmental or…

Human Services
6
Friends Health Connection a New Jersy Nonprofit Corporation

Connectiong loved ones battling the same condition for mutual support

Human Services
7
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
8
Jewish Federation of Cumberland Gloucester & Salem Counties

Advancement of the Jewish Community

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Endowment Inc

To further the purposes of jewish family & children's services of northern new jersey, inc.

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Nj a New Jersey Nonprofit Corp

Jewish family service of metrowest, new jersey provides innovative, compassionate, and outstanding social services to enhance the independence and well-being of individuals and families throughout all stages of life within the metrowest,…

Philanthropy
11
Epilepsy Services of New Jersey a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

Epilepsy services of new jersey (esnj) is a state-wide, non-profit charitable agency dedicated to helping to improve the quality of life for people affected by epilepsy and their loved ones. esnj will ensure that people with seizures find…

12
Jewish Community Center of Metrowest Inc

Jcc metrowest's vision is to be the premier jewish social, recreational, cultural, and educational center that serves the entire metrowest community and inspires every individual to explore the boundless potential of judaism. (continued on…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jillian Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH HOME FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF NJ INC — $112,100 · OtherJEWISH HOME FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF NJ INCVALLEY CHABAD INC — $90,000 · OtherVALLEY CHABAD INCTHE VALERIE FUND — $67,000 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUNDBERGEN COUNTY Y A JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $22,900 · OtherBERGEN COUNTY Y A JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERORANGETOWN JEWISH CENTER — $14,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY — $13,500 · Other+8 more — $20,660 · Other+8 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $30,100 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FE…E-MOTION INC — $2,500 · HealthCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $1,200 · InternationalNEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S — $500 · Human Services
Other$340,160Philanthropy$30,100Health$2,500International$1,200Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $67,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $30,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES INC — $6,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetE-MOTION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JILLIAN FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds THE ARC OF BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds E-MOTION INC
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE JILLIAN FUND
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ruth Warshaw Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Arc of Bergen and Passaic Counties Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ruth Warshaw Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ruth Warshaw Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph