Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$289kEducation$239kHealth$134kFood & Nutrition$90kInternational$33kReligion$29kYouth Development$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$16,000
ARC OF CALHOUN & CLEBURNE COUNTIES$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM$10,000
FREEDOM FARM$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
UMS WRIGHT$6,000
HELEN JAMES FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM$5,000
LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE$3,000
CIRCLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,720
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $25k → 16%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $41k → 14%URBAN MINISTRY: $25k → 16%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $24k → 14%URBAN MINISTRY: $25k → 16%PLANT THE SEED: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$781k · 20 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$781k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+0%

Still filing today

35%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    Urban Ministry Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +32%
  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $65k · revenue +124%
  • HJ
    HELEN JAMES FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +234% · 65% of their budget

Funded once

  • PH
    PINE HILL ARLIINGTON METHODIST
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • PP
    PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Inner City Ministry Inc

Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.

—
2
First United Methodist Church Child Development Center

Operation of a daycare program for children.

Education
3
Children and Family Urban Ministries D/B/a Children and Family Urban Movement

To create a community to support the potential of children, youth, and families through educational success, healthy living, and community engagement.

Crime & Legal
4
Youth Villages Foundation Inc

Provide financial and support services for youth villages, inc.

Human Services
5
Covenant Academy of Mobile

Operation of a public charter school in Mobile Alabama.

Human Services
6
The Villages Inc

Ensuring the safety and well-being of children entrusted to our care while empowering them to prepare for the future.

—
7
Harding Academy of Memphis Inc

Harding academy of memphis, inc. is a private school providing education from pre kindergarten through grade twelve.

Education
8
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
9
Oak Hills United Methodist Church Child Care Center Inc

Child care services

—
10
Little Lights Urban Ministries Inc

Little Lights Urban Ministries empowers underserved youth and families in Washington, DC with the love of Christ. We seek to develop their God-given potential spiritually, socially and intellectually through academics, life skills, the…

Youth Development
11
Lilyfield Inc

Lilyfield is a christ-centered ministry devoted to providing healthy families for at-risk children and youth.

Human Services
12
East Tennessee Christian Home Inc

The Home was organized to provide for the health, welfare and benefit of children whose parents or guardians are unable to care for them. The Home offers residential care and onsite academic

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is Helen James Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $196,010 · OtherCOASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGECOMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM: $137,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAMARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES INC: $48,000 · OtherARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES INCARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIE: $37,000 · OtherARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIEYOUTH VILLAGES INC LIFESET PROGRAM: $36,887 · OtherYOUTH VILLAGES INC LIFESET PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,274 · Other+20 more: $121,885 · Other+20 moreUrban Ministry Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry IncYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $64,744 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INC+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHELEN JAMES FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthFREEDOM FARM INC: $12,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION: $3,000 · Religion
Other$634,056Human Services$140,744Health$35,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUrban Ministry Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $64,744 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES INC: $48,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetHELEN JAMES FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 65% of budgetUMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR KIDS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANT THE SEED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIRST LIGHT COMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Urban Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF CALHOUN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELEN JAMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANT THE SEED ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIGHT COMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ruth Q Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth Q Davis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph