Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth and Paul Connor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$330k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$843kReligion$540kInternational$280kHousing & Shelter$188kYouth Development$80kCivil Rights$20kEducation$15kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY CENTER$80,000
SIDE BY SIDE KIDS$50,000
HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN$47,500
REDEEM INTERNATIONAL$40,000
CASA ESPERANZA INC DBA HOPE HOUSE$22,500
SETTLEMENT HOME FOR CHILDREN$20,000
VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION DBA SAINT LOUISE HOUSE$15,000
WONDERS & WORRIES$15,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$10,000
ESSILOR LUXOTTICA FOUNDATION$10,000
AUSTIN BRIDGE BUILDERS ALLIANCE$5,000
FAMILY ELDERCARE INC$5,000
TRIPLE 1 BLESSINGS INC$5,000
YOUNG LIFE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $395k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $53k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $48k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $48k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $48k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $48k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $48k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $15k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $14k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $13k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $12k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $11k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $10k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 18 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against -38% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-38%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $310k · revenue +17%
  • RI
    Redeem International
    5× · 2020–2024 · $190k · revenue +738%
  • CE
    Casa Esperanza Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • LR
    Laity Renewal Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue -38%
  • AI
    ABOLITION INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
4
Austin City Lutherans

Address food and housing insecurity for Austin-area low income families.

Religion
5
Elijah Family Homes

Elijah family homes fosters hope, dignity, and self-sufficiency through stable housing and support services for families seeking recovery.

Housing & Shelter
6
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
7
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
9
Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge

Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.

—
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
12
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Laity Renewal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY CENTER AT ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $493,000 · OtherTRINITY CENTER AT ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL CHUR…VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATIONESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherESSILOR VISION FOUNDATIONTRIPLE 1 BLESSINGS: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+6 more: $77,000 · Other+6 moreSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC: $310,000 · Human ServicesSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INCHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $290,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INCWonders & Worries Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesWonders & Worries IncFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCasa Esperanza Inc: $135,000 · HealthCasa Esperanza…THE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $115,000 · HealthTHE SETTLEMENT…Redeem International: $190,000 · InternationalRedeem Intern…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $50,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…YOUNG LIFE: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$745,000Human Services$715,000Health$250,000International$240,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC: $310,000 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $290,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRedeem International: $190,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetCasa Esperanza Inc: $135,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $115,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWonders & Worries Inc: $75,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLaity Renewal Foundation: $17,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALLIES AGAINST SLAVERY: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetAUSTIN BRIDGE BUILDERS ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Redeem International ↗
  • Who funds Casa Esperanza Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SETTLEMENT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ELDERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Laity Renewal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALLIES AGAINST SLAVERY ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN BRIDGE BUILDERS ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Donald D Hammill Foundation · A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · United Way Worldwide · United Way for Greater Austin · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth and Paul Connor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth and Paul Connor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth and Paul Connor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph