Skip to content

· Private foundation

Russell's Garden Center Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$107kArts & Culture$80kEducation$7kInternational$3kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$3kPublic Benefit$1kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$105,866
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUSSELL'S GARDEN CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$105,866
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $50 → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $50 → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
AR
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 43 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 43 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
39

Total granted

$74k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+24%

Still filing today

56%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
InternationalEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PHILLIPS BROOKS HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +37%
  • SV
    SUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +129%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $600 · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BW
    BOSTON - WBUR
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • MH
    MASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bookfriends International Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUSSELL'S GARDEN CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $105,866 · OtherRUSSELL'S GARDEN CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONBOSTON UNIVERSITY - WBUR: $54,600 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY - WBURBOSTON - WBUR: $22,300 · OtherBOSTON - WBUR+55 more: $15,845 · Other+55 morePHILLIPS BROOKS HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · EducationWAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $900 · EducationOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $600 · EducationLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $520 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $600 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $600 · InternationalOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $450 · InternationalMADRE INC: $400 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $250 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $200 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $200 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $200 · InternationalEL PORVENIR: $150 · International+3 more: $300 · InternationalSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $1,200 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $200 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $100 · EnvironmentNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $100 · EnvironmentGovernment Accountability Project: $500 · Public BenefitABOUT FACE VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR: $200 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $500 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $200 · Food & NutritionWINSOR MUSIC INC: $400 · Arts & Culture
Other$198,611Education$3,620International$3,350Environment$1,600Public Benefit$700Food & Nutrition$700Arts & Culture$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILLIPS BROOKS HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $520 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGovernment Accountability Project: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINSOR MUSIC INC: $400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMADRE INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM HUNGER: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABOUT FACE VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PORVENIR: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUDDY DOG HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILLIPS BROOKS HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN COLLEGE ALUMNAE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Government Accountability Project ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds WINSOR MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MADRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FROM HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds ABOUT FACE VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beard Family Charitable Trust John E Beard TrusteeMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beard Family Charitable Trust John E Beard Trustee · Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Tides Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Communal Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Russell's Garden Center Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Russell's Garden Center Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Sterling College: 10% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Russell's Garden Center Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Russell's Garden Center Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Russell's Garden Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph