Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rukavina Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$400kHealth$390kReligion$345kEducation$300kInternational$152kHousing & Shelter$115kRecreation & Sports$57kYouth Development$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $230k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITITIES TWIN CITIES$30,000
NATOPIWO PARTNERS$30,000
MILKWEED EDITIONS$20,000
ST MARY'S IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH$20,000
ABRIA PREGNANCY RESOURCES$20,000
OPERATION BOOTSTRAP - AFRICA$20,000
OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN$15,000
ST MARY'S HEALTH CLINICS$15,000
TOGETHER FOR GOOD$10,000
PHILOMENA HOUSE MATERNITY HOME$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UPTON PROGRAM$10,000
BROTHERHOOD OF HOPE$5,000
THE RETREAT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $20k → 9%WOMENSOURCE: $10k → 7%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $20k → 9%WOMENSOURCE: $5k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL: $10k → 14%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $20k → 11%THE PHILOMENA HOUSE: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $15k → 14%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $30k → 14%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $20k → 14%SISTER RISING WORLDWIDE: $15k → 14%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $10k → 14%SISTER RISING WORLDWIDE: $10k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $5k → 14%DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
IA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Rukavina Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rukavina Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 36 repeat orgs$466k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
35

Total granted

$1.5M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+6%

Still filing today

36%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TOGETHER FOR GOOD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +137%
  • SM
    ST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS
    3× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +9%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOSANNA CHURCH - LAKEVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
  • SO
    SHEPHERDS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITITIES OF ST PAUL & MPLS
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
3
Madonna Meadows of Rochester

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
6
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
7
Benedictine Living Communities - Bismarck Inc Dba St Gabriels Community

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
8
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
9
Saint Anne of Winona

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
10
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
11
Madonna Towers of Rochester Inc

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
12
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
16/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RETREAT: $150,000 · OtherTHE RETREATCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $147,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESUNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC: $90,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INCSPRINGTIDE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $65,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherICSEE: $57,045 · OtherHOSANNA CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherNATOPIWO PARTNERS: $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNION: $49,000 · Other+50 more: $714,500 · Other+50 moreTOGETHER FOR GOOD: $100,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FOR…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…Sisters Rising Worldwide: $25,000 · Human ServicesSisters Risi…OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $20,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF…WOMENS CARE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS CARE …THE PHILOMENA HOUSE CORP: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE PHILOMEN…Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $70,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $45,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 · HealthLUTHER COLLEGE: $45,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $34,000 · EducationBLUFFVIEW MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationCOLEGIO SAN JOSE MARIANIST CORP: $9,000 · EducationMILKWEED EDITIONS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $15,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATION BOOTSTRAP-AFRICA: $20,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · InternationalBETHLEHEM INN OF WASECA: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,437,545Human Services$222,500Health$125,000Education$103,500Arts & Culture$35,000International$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOGETHER FOR GOOD: $100,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC: $90,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $45,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetDULUTH ROWING CLUB: $35,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetPERSPECTIVES INC: $34,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $34,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSisters Rising Worldwide: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN OF WASECA: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetMILKWEED EDITIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENS CARE CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBLUFFVIEW MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PHILOMENA HOUSE CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JAMES COFFEE: $7,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTY IS HER CALL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER FALLS PREGNANCY HELPLINE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWINONA FAMILY YMCA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAMIANO OF DULUTH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING STAR WAKOTA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOGETHER FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LIFE-CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds DULUTH ROWING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds PERSPECTIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Sisters Rising Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN OF WASECA ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BOOTSTRAP-AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds MILKWEED EDITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CARE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Foundation of MinnesotaMN25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Winona Community Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Gostomski Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Communitygiving · United Way Worldwide · Elizabeth Callender King Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rukavina Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rukavina Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rukavina Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rukavina Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rukavina Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph