Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruehlow Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$975kHealth$491kHousing & Shelter$333kYouth Development$263kReligion$147kHuman Services$130kInternational$100kFood & Nutrition$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$100,000
HOPE STREET MINISTRY$50,000
PURE FREEDOM MINISTRIES$32,500
YOUNG LIFE$17,500
UNICEF$10,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$10,000
HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$10,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$10,000
LAKE COUNTRY CARING$10,000
NORTH LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
FAYE GEHL CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
LIFE MOVES$5,000
FAMILY HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $2k → 5%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $10k → 5%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $10k → 5%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $5k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY CARING: $30k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY CARING: $25k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY CARING: $10k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY CARING: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
WV
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 36 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$2.4M
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+3%

Still filing today

61%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $900k · revenue +59%
  • HOPE STREET MINISTRY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +82%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • NB
    NORTH BAY FIRE RELIEF
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • JY
    Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Mercy Health System Corporation

The mission of mercy health system corporation (mhsc) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
4
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Community Memorial Hospital of Menomonee Falls Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
9
Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi

Second harvest foodbank exists to end hunger in southwestern wisconsin.

Food & Nutrition
10
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Defense; the most unlike its peers is North Lake Education Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $900,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGNorth Lake Education Foundation Incorporated: $55,000 · EducationNorth Lake Education Foundation Incorpor…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC: $195,000 · HealthHOPE STREET MINISTRY INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $160,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association…LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC: $120,000 · HealthLAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INCPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · HealthPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $21,000 · Health+4 more: $27,750 · HealthPURE FREEDOM MINISTRIES: $87,500 · OtherPURE FREEDOM MINISTRIESMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $77,715 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONOPERATION DREAM INC: $49,000 · OtherOPERATION DREAM INCYOUNG LIFE - ARROWHEAD: $44,500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - ARROWHEADYOUNG LIFE CHARITY: $33,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherLIFEMOVES: $30,000 · OtherNORTH BAY FIRE RELIEF: $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25,000 · OtherJuntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc: $25,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $40,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALL…HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $30,000 · Other+25 more: $227,000 · Other+25 moreYOUNG LIFE: $92,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentOASIS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAKE COUNTRY CARING INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC: $26,021 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 · ReligionTHE STARTING POINT PROJECT INC: $12,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · International
Education$960,000Health$628,750Other$723,715Youth Development$132,500Human Services$106,021Religion$63,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $900,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC: $195,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $160,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC: $120,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $92,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY CARING INC: $75,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetNorth Lake Education Foundation Incorporated: $55,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $49,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC: $26,021 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAYE GEHL CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STARTING POINT PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRICIAS TROOPS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Faith Resource Community Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds HOPE STREET MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTRY CARING INC ↗
  • Who funds North Lake Education Foundation Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FAYE GEHL CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STARTING POINT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI20.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · STACKNER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC co KRISTIN A OCCHETTI · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Arthur C Kootz Foundation · Dalum Family Foundation · Jean & Thomas Harbeck Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruehlow Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruehlow Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruehlow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph