Skip to content
Rueb Idaho Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rueb Idaho Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$186kAnimals$83kYouth Development$75kFood & Nutrition$55kRecreation & Sports$41kHealth$20kArts & Culture$19kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$10,000
FRIENDS OF ZOO BOISE$10,000
JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO$8,000
MERIDIAN FOOD BANK$5,000
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$5,000
CATCH BOISE$5,000
IDAHO FOOD BANK$4,500
FACES OF HOPE$4,000
IDAHO CHILDREN'S HOME$4,000
MERIDIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS$2,500
LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE$2,500
WEST VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION IDAHO$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $3k → 11%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $3k → 11%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $3k → 11%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $2k → 11%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $3k → 14%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $2k → 11%DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS: $2k → 11%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $2k → 14%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%LEMHI AFTER-SCHOOL PROMISE: $1k → 14%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $7k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $7k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $7k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $5k → 8%JESSIE TREE OF IDAHO: $4k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$568k · 37 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
1

Total granted

$568k
$2k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Women's and Children's Alliance
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +26%
  • TJ
    THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +777%
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
2
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
3
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
4
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
5
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
6
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
7
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
8
Rainier Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to nourish with good food, empower with knowledge, and serve with compassion.

Unclassified
9
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
10
Idaho Diaper Bank Inc

Building stronger, healthier, families in idaho by providing access to basic hygiene to keep babies clean, dry, & happy.

Human Services
11
Boise Farmers Market Inc

The Boise Farmers Market supports a regenerative, healthy food and agricultural system by operating a vibrant marketplace featuring locally grown and crafted products.

Community Improvement
12
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Valley County Search & Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF ZOO BOISE: $62,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ZOO BOISEMERIDIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $28,500 · OtherMERIDIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBID CHILDREN'S HOME: $24,500 · OtherID CHILDREN'S HOMEFACES OF HOPE: $21,000 · OtherFACES OF HOPECATCH BOISE: $20,500 · OtherCATCH BOISECASCADE MEDICAL CENTER: $15,500 · OtherBOISE BICYCLE PROGRAM: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherWEST VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherBOISE CHORISTERS: $11,000 · Other+17 more: $85,200 · Other+17 moreWomen's and Children's Alliance: $62,000 · Human ServicesWomen's and Children's AllianceTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INCIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INCLEMHIS AFTER SCHOOL PROMISE INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesLEMHIS AFTER SCHOOL PROMISE INCDYNAMIC DIMENSIONS INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesDYNAMIC DIMENSIONS INCMERIDIAN FOOD BANK INC: $26,500 · Food & NutritionMERIDIAN …IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $19,600 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOO…CALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionCALDWELL …IDAHO BUSINESS FOR EDUCATION INC: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIVING DESERT THE: $10,000 · EnvironmentBoise Bully Breed Rescue: $7,500 · EducationGUTHRIE CENTER CORP: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$320,200Human Services$167,500Food & Nutrition$50,100Youth Development$14,000Environment$10,000Education$7,500Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $62,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $41,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMERIDIAN FOOD BANK INC: $26,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $19,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEMHIS AFTER SCHOOL PROMISE INC: $19,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetIDAHO BUSINESS FOR EDUCATION INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDYNAMIC DIMENSIONS INC: $13,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE: $8,000 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetBoise Bully Breed Rescue: $7,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGUTHRIE CENTER CORP: $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLEARNING LAB INC: $5,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MERIDIAN FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LEMHIS AFTER SCHOOL PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO BUSINESS FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Boise Bully Breed Rescue ↗
  • Who funds GUTHRIE CENTER CORP ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds CALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate Banc…Idaho Community Found…The Julius C Jeker Fo…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rueb Idaho Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rueb Idaho Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Guthrie Center Corp: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rueb Idaho Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rueb Idaho Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rueb Idaho’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home