Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$926kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$23kReligion$14kFood & Nutrition$13kHealth$10kEmployment$4kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$24,000
ST NICHOLAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$22,500
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
PIERCE COLLEGE$12,704
LIFE ACADEMY$10,000
HOLY ROSARY SCHOOL$8,425
SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH CENTER$5,182
YOUNG LIFE GREATER TACOMA$5,125
CHAPEL HILL PRE-SCHOOL$3,300
TACOMA SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH FOOD BANK: $13k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
OR
CA
CO
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$873k · 21 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$873k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

57%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
    6× · 2017–2022 · $169k · revenue +7%
  • PL
    Pacific Lutheran University
    5× · 2017–2021 · $137k · revenue +3%
  • SM
    SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $86k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • VC
    VISITATION CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • SB
    SUNNY BOOK MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • GH
    GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
3
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
4
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
10
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is Gig Harbor Peninsula Fish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $168,834 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PORTLANDPacific Lutheran University: $136,873 · EducationPacific Lutheran UniversitySAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $86,000 · EducationSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITYAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $44,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITYBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $37,500 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCCARROLL COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $25,500 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $23,088 · Education+3 more: $24,132 · EducationHOLY ROSARY SCHOOL: $106,622 · OtherHOLY ROSARY SCHOOLSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $73,377 · OtherSEATTLE UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $27,500 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICESPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITYST NICHOLAS CHURCH: $22,500 · OtherPIERCE COLLEGE: $21,849 · OtherVISITATION CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherSUNNY BOOK MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $14,500 · Other+17 more: $120,201 · Other+17 moreGIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH: $12,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 · Youth Development
Education$573,427Other$426,549Human Services$12,500Health$5,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $168,834 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $136,873 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $86,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $73,377 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $44,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $25,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $23,088 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,132 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch Trust?

Find your warmest path to Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rudolph David Roller Ed Ch’s filings →

More from the funding graph