Skip to content

Massachusetts · Private foundation

Rudnick Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
28
Grants FY2025
19
Organizations funded FY2024
26%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100
Largest grant, FY2025
$13,516
Organizations funded a year
14 to 23
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
10
Total assets, FY2025
$555k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 26% of the organizations Rudnick Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving27$23k52%
FY202419$12k26%
FY202316$4k0%
FY202214$5k0%
FY202120$5k5%
FY202023$6k48%
FY201917$12k29%
FY201821$12kn/a
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$56kReligion$45kHealth$3kArts & Culture$2kCivil Rights$1kHousing & Shelter$900International$652Youth Development$400Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 25 grantees
All grantees of Rudnick Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Temple Beth Zion$39,6368n/a
American Heart Association Inc$1,16080%
Museum of Fine Arts$84070%
Horizons for Homeless Children$70070%
American Cancer Society Inc$60060%
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum$43850%
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc$43260%
Hias Inc$40040%
Special Olympics Inc$28880%
The Good People Fund Inc$18010%
Blessed Sacrament Church$1722n/a
Wounded Warrior Project Inc$10010%
Compassionate Care ALS Inc$10010%
Goucher College$10020%
Anti-Defamation League$10010%
Dana-Farber Inc$10010%
Boston by Foot Inc$7510%
Hand in Hand USA$721n/a
Assumption University$7010%
The Trustees of Reservations$7010%
Yedei Chesed Inc$5410%
Hebrew College$5010%
Friends of the Charlestown Library Ltd$361n/a
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$3610%
Meals on Wheels Inc$3610%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 32 recipients with no EIN on record ($32k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Rudnick Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,160 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Fine Arts: $840 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHorizons for Homeless Children: $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $438 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Jewish Women's Archive Inc: $432 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHias Inc: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Inc: $288 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Good People Fund Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGoucher College: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoston by Foot Inc: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssumption University: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Reservations: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYedei Chesed Inc: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew College: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rudnick Charitable Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rudnick Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Rudnick Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Rudnick Charitable Trust

How much does Rudnick Charitable Trust give?
Rudnick Charitable Trust reported 28 grants totaling $23,197 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Rudnick Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (49%), Religion (40%), Health (3%).
Who are Rudnick Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Temple Beth Zion ($40k), American Heart Association Inc ($1k), Museum of Fine Arts ($840).
Does Rudnick Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 26% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Rudnick Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rudnick Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Rudnick Charitable Trust based?
Rudnick Charitable Trust is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rudnick’s filings →

More from the funding graph