Skip to content
Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.4MEnvironment$1.4MHealth$380kArts & Culture$274kEducation$274kAnimals$200kReligion$165kHuman Services$117kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$250,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$50,000
ABERDEEN CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM$50,000
T-TOWN TNR$25,000
BARNABAS CENTER INC$25,000
SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG$25,000
PITIFUL PUPS INC$25,000
1440 PROMISE CORPORATION$25,000
PUPPY HAVEN RESCUE$25,000
WILD HEART RANCH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BREAKTHOUGHS ON A MISSIONS: $15k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%UMA CENTER: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
SD
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 20 repeat orgs$654k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$1.2M
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+5%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $250k · revenue +46% · 37% of their budget
  • TULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $227k · revenue +50%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $110k · revenue +77% · 73% of their budget

Funded once

  • RF
    Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +5%
  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Dawgs Project
    one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue -48%
  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nassau County Spca Inc

The nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3) organized to protect animals from abuse and neglect.(see schedule o)the nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3)…

Animals
2
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
4
St Augustine Humane Society Inc

Promoting healthy responsible lifelong pet ownership by serving the medical and rehabilitative needs of animals while encouraging the humane treatment of animals, preventing overpopulation, and ending animal cruelty.

Animals
5
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
6
The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue

Is a volunteer-based non profit organization that saves dogs and cats from death (high kill shelters) and adopts them to loving families.

Animals
7
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
8
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
9
Humane Society of South Brevard Inc

Animal Shelter, Adoptions and Related Services

Animals
10
Animal Rescue Corps Inc

To end animal suffering through direct and compassionate action, and to inspire the highest ethical standards of humanity towards animals. The Organization rescues animals who fall victim to abuse and natural disaster.

Animals
11
Fluvanna County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To rescue domestic animals from cruelty, neglect, and abandonment and place

Animals
12
Humane Society of Napa County & Spca Inc

To promote the welfare of companion animals through protection, advocacy, education, and by example.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Victor Valley Community Concert. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,365,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $250,000 · OtherTULSA AREA UNITED WAYABERDEEN CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS: $100,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80,000 · Other+30 more: $568,000 · Other+30 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $1,162,628 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR …+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES: $250,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthCommunity Cancer Association: $10,000 · HealthTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $226,995 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $103,500 · EducationSIOP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationFirst Coast No More Homeless Pets Inc: $43,000 · AnimalsT-TOWN TNR INC: $40,000 · AnimalsPUPPY HAVEN RESCUE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsPitiful Pups Inc: $25,000 · Animals+2 more: $4,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC: $110,000 · ReligionBarnabas Foundation: $20,000 · Religion
Other$2,363,000Philanthropy$1,163,628Health$280,000Arts & Culture$226,995Education$143,500Animals$137,000Religion$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,365,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES: $250,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $226,995 over 2y, 15% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC: $110,000 over 4y, 73% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $103,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS CENTER INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Coast No More Homeless Pets Inc: $43,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetT-TOWN TNR INC: $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetVICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY CONCERT: $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budget1440 Promise Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPitiful Pups Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetRocky Mountain Dawgs Project: $22,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetBRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMicahs Place Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Uma Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCommunity Cancer Association: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASSAU HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOUSE OF SIOUX FALLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Tulsa Community Found…Joseph & Drenda Vijuk…The Claud E Easterly …The Burroughs Family …Rose M & Robert W Stu…Jacksonville Jaguars …Ge Aerospace Foundati…Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …
The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Joseph & Drenda Vijuk Foundation · The Claud E Easterly Foundation Inc · The Burroughs Family Foundation · Rose M & Robert W Stubbs Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Micahs Place Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rtjc Hogan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home