Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.4MEnvironment$1.4MHealth$380kArts & Culture$274kEducation$274kAnimals$200kReligion$165kHuman Services$117kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$250,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$50,000
ABERDEEN CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM$50,000
BARNABAS CENTER INC$25,000
1440 PROMISE CORPORATION$25,000
T-TOWN TNR$25,000
SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG$25,000
PITIFUL PUPS INC$25,000
PUPPY HAVEN RESCUE$25,000
WILD HEART RANCH$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%BREAKTHOUGHS ON A MISSIONS: $15k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%UMA CENTER: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
SD
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 20 repeat orgs$654k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$1.2M
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+5%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $250k · revenue +46% · 37% of their budget
  • TULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $227k · revenue +50%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $110k · revenue +77% · 73% of their budget

Funded once

  • RF
    Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +5%
  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Dawgs Project
    one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue -48%
  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nassau County Spca Inc

The nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3) organized to protect animals from abuse and neglect.(see schedule o)the nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3)…

Animals
2
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
4
St Augustine Humane Society Inc

Promoting healthy responsible lifelong pet ownership by serving the medical and rehabilitative needs of animals while encouraging the humane treatment of animals, preventing overpopulation, and ending animal cruelty.

Animals
5
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
6
The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue

Is a volunteer-based non profit organization that saves dogs and cats from death (high kill shelters) and adopts them to loving families.

Animals
7
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
8
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
9
Humane Society of South Brevard Inc

Animal Shelter, Adoptions and Related Services

Animals
10
Animal Rescue Corps Inc

To end animal suffering through direct and compassionate action, and to inspire the highest ethical standards of humanity towards animals. The Organization rescues animals who fall victim to abuse and natural disaster.

Animals
11
Fluvanna County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To rescue domestic animals from cruelty, neglect, and abandonment and place

Animals
12
Humane Society of Napa County & Spca Inc

To promote the welfare of companion animals through protection, advocacy, education, and by example.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Victor Valley Community Concert. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…United Way FederationsFood Pantries & AssistanceSubstance Abuse TreatmentAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Youth Development CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%43%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,365,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $250,000 · OtherTULSA AREA UNITED WAYABERDEEN CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS — $100,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $80,000 · Other+30 more — $568,000 · Other+30 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC — $1,162,628 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR …+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES — $250,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthCommunity Cancer Association — $10,000 · HealthTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $226,995 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $103,500 · EducationSIOP FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EducationFirst Coast No More Homeless Pets Inc — $43,000 · AnimalsT-TOWN TNR INC — $40,000 · AnimalsPitiful Pups Inc — $25,000 · AnimalsPUPPY HAVEN RESCUE INC — $25,000 · Animals+2 more — $4,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC — $110,000 · ReligionBarnabas Foundation — $20,000 · Religion
Other$2,363,000Philanthropy$1,163,628Health$280,000Arts & Culture$226,995Education$143,500Animals$137,000Religion$130,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,365,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORI COMMUNITY AND EVALUATION SERVICES — $250,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $226,995 over 2y, 15% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST JOHNS CHAPEL INC — $110,000 over 4y, 73% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $103,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS CENTER INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Coast No More Homeless Pets Inc — $43,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetT-TOWN TNR INC — $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetVICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY CONCERT — $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetPitiful Pups Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budget1440 Promise Corporation — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Dawgs Project — $22,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetBRAIN INJURY RECOVERY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMicahs Place Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Uma Center Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCommunity Cancer Association — $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASSAU HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS HOUSE OF SIOUX FALLS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Joseph & Drenda Vijuk Foundation · The Claud E Easterly Foundation Inc · The Burroughs Family Foundation · Rose M & Robert W Stubbs Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Micahs Place Inc32% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rtjc Hogan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph