Skip to content
Rsf Social Finance Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rsf Social Finance Inc

We envision a world where all people have the power to use their money to regenerate people, communities, and the planet.

$60M
Granted FY2024still arriving
457
Grants FY2024still arriving
43
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$31MCivil Rights$30MEnvironment$28MFood & Nutrition$25MCommunity Improvement$23MInternational$20MArts & Culture$14MEducation$10MOther$0
02FY2024 · 457 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 457 grants below total $48,191,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,394,155 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,202,755 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $362k
  • $10k–50k257 grants · $5.1M
  • $50k–250k113 grants · $11M
  • $250k+35 grants · $32M
$25,000
Median grant
43
States reached
$108M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACTASSETS INC$5,520,632
NATIONAL BLACK FOOD AND JUSTICE ALLIANCE$3,008,514
GLOBAL WHOLE BEING FUND$2,650,000
LIVING LANDS TRUST$2,338,139
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$2,283,054
NEW WORLD FOUNDATION$1,663,198
EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE$1,310,315
FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC$1,250,000
QUIPA INC$1,020,000
IMPACT CHARITABLE$1,000,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN BENITO COUNTY$833,185
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$764,104
FRIENDS OF VANCOUVER FOUNDATION$721,195
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$590,000
THE FARM SCHOOL INC$506,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP OF OJAI: $100k → 10%SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE: $210k → 18%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $1.3M → 18%ALCHEMY INC: $150k → 13%REALIZE IMPACT: $404k → 10%STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $200k → 33%RED SHOES INC: $150k → 19%AFFECT REAL CHANGE INC: $103k → 24%PRIME COALITION: $300k → 8%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $865k → 18%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $138k → 14%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $106k → 26%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $540k → 18%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $125k → 14%INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS INC: $130k → 9%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $100k → 26%RUDOLF STEINER FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $277k → 14%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $335k → 18%AFFECT REAL CHANGE INC: $160k → 10%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $115k → 18%VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES: $151k → 23%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $100k → 20%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $360k → 23%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $100k → 9%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $100k → 20%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $330k → 23%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $100k → 20%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY PENNSYLVANIA: $100k → 22%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $100k → 20%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $350k → 9%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $300k → 9%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $200k → 9%COMMONWEAL: $355k → 8%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL: $200k → 9%COMMONWEAL: $219k → 8%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $200k → 9%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $2.7M → 17%COMMONWEAL: $190k → 8%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $180k → 9%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $1.7M → 17%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $1.6M → 17%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $150k → 9%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $886k → 17%WAVES FOR WATER INC: $116k → 14%CIRCLE OF HEARTS FOUNDATION: $136k → 10%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $587k → 10%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $500k → 10%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $200k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $11M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$3.2M · 29% · 70 grants

Stated purpose: FOR GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · TO REVIEW THE OASIS MATHARE STRATEGIC PLAN · TO SUPPORT CONFLICT AFFECTED, FLEEING AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PASTORALIST HERDERS ACCESS WATER FOR THEIR LIVESTOCK AND FAMILIES

East Asia and the Pacific$2.1M · 19% · 38 grants

Stated purpose: FOR STEPPE DISCOVERIES: EXPLORING EASTERN MONGOLIA'S GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEM AND CULTURAL HERITAGE · FOR "LEARNING BY DOING-LEGAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS DEFENDER" PROJECT · FOR SHE BUILDS PEACE: MIND HER VOICE, LEAD THE CHANGE, SHAPE THE FUTURE

Central America and the Caribbean$1.9M · 17% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: FOR STRENGTHENING TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE AND REVALUING ANCESTRAL KNOWLEDGE THROUGH THE ACTIVE AND PROACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF INDIGENOUS CHORTI' WOMEN · FOR EMPOWERING INDIGENOUS MAYA WOMEN THROUGH BIOCULTURAL INNOVATION USING LOCAL FOREST PRODUCE · FOR PATHWAYS OF KNOWLEDGE: INTEGRATING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TO EMPOWER STUDENTS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE PROMOTION OF SUSTAINABLE JOBS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.3M · 12% · 24 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT THE DISTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOSOPHICAL NEWS AND EDUCATION · TO SUPPORT GUINEAN COMMUNITY AND NGO PARTICIPATION IN AN EXPOSURE VISIT TO GERMANY · TO SUPPORT THE DEFUND AGRIBUSINESS GATHERING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.1M · 10% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: FOR TERRITORIAL REGENERATION OF TLAOLA MOUNTAIN; REFORESTATION IN THE INDIGENOUS MUNICIPALITY OF TLAOLA, PUEBLA IN RESPONSE TO THE 2024 FIRES · FOR GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · TO SUPPORT MAKEWAY FOUNDATION'S WILDLANDS FUND FOR PROTECTION OF THE HUDSON BAY AND JAMES BAY LOWLANDS AND CARBON-RICH FORESTS OF THE BOREAL

South America$1.1M · 10% · 29 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT GUINEA-SIMANDOU DELEGATION IN MINAS GERAIS AND CONTRIBUTE TO RELIEF EFFORTS FOR DAM FLOODING VICTIMS · FOR EMERGENCY SUPPORT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AFFECTED BY FLOODS AND FIRES · FOR GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT

South Asia$260k · 2% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: TO EMPOWER WOMEN AND YOUTH TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ADVANCING LEADERSHIP, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION IN SUNDARGARH DISTRICT · FOR REVITALIZING INDIGENOUS ECONOMIES: EMPOWERING WOMEN THROUGH CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ECONOMIC AUTONOMY IN NAGALAND · TO EMPOWER INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES THROUGH INDIGENOUS-LED COMMUNITY TELEVISION IN NEPAL

Russia and Neighboring States$170k · 2% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: FOR SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRADITIONAL PRACTICES AT THE ULYTAU PETROGLYPHS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TEREKTY-AULIE COMPLEX) · FOR PRESERVATION AND DISSEMINATION OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT PETROGLYPHS OF NURATA MOUNTAINS (SARMYSHSOY, CHANGLISOY, BIYRONSOY) THROUGH PUBLICATION OF THE BOOK-ALBUM · FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL CROPS COMMUNITY SEED BANK IN RASHT DISTRICT, TAJIKISTAN

Middle East and North Africa$7k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FOR #COOP-TECH LOCAL MOBILE INCUBATOR

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Rsf Social Finance Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 25%.

Rsf Social Finance Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$155M · 622 repeat orgs$27M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

622 repeat relationships: 297 still active in FY2024, 325 since wound down; 135 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

622
535

Total granted

$155M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+23%

Still filing today

91%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +30%
  • CL
    CHOOSE LOVE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6.9M · revenue +163% · 28% of their budget
  • LL
    LIVING LANDS TRUST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +176% · 82% of their budget

Funded once

  • FOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.2M · revenue +55% · 25% of their budget
  • GI
    Groundswell International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $510k · revenue +60%
  • BR
    Beneficial Returns
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
2
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
3
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
4
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
5
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
6
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
7
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
8
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
9
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
10
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ho Chou Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1233 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1233 of the 1,357 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

103
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
370
Early backer (in before they grew)
1191/1233
Grantees still filing
800/1233
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPACTASSETSINC: $9,190,843 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINCTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION: $4,760,084 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDAT…TIDES FOUNDATION: $3,145,821 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $2,369,753 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPI…Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Phila…THE DENVER FOUNDATION: $1,817,229 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVER FOUNDATIONAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $1,764,477 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitabl…+11 more: $7,233,743 · Philanthropy+11 moreCHOOSE LOVE INC: $6,881,000 · Human ServicesCHOOSE LOVE IN…EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $3,200,315 · Human ServicesEKVNV YEFOLECV…Friends International Inc: $1,580,000 · Human ServicesFriends Intern…THE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $1,324,810 · Human ServicesTHE POLLINATIO…COMMONWEAL: $952,847 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $886,000 · Human Services+16 more: $6,068,545 · Human Services+16 moreLIVING LANDS TRUST: $6,823,472 · Food & NutritionLIVING LANDS …National Black Food and Justice Alliance: $3,158,514 · Food & NutritionNational Blac…FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES: $1,905,000 · Food & NutritionFEDERATION OF…JUBILEE JUSTICE INC: $1,741,162 · Food & NutritionJUBILEE JUSTI…THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,718,994 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD…Canticle Farm: $1,314,372 · Food & NutritionCanticle FarmURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $765,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 more: $2,620,990 · Food & Nutrition+7 moreBOSTON IMPACT INITIATIVE FUND: $2,264,902 · Community ImprovementBOSTON IM…Higher Purpose Hub: $1,968,700 · Community ImprovementHigher Pu…COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $1,450,840 · Community ImprovementCOMMON CO…INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $1,343,650 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING…NDN COLLECTIVE INC: $1,075,500 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLE…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $914,422 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY …HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $800,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTE…HUI MALAMA I KE ALA ULILI: $675,000 · Community ImprovementTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $540,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTURE: $522,500 · Community ImprovementTHE WORKING WORLD INC: $469,232 · Community Improvement+8 more: $2,042,949 · Community Improvement+8 moreGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $1,664,600 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GR…CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $1,215,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE J…QUIPA INC: $1,020,000 · EnvironmentQUIPA INCNEW VENTURE FUND: $781,680 · EnvironmentNEW VENTU…Planting Justice: $598,218 · EnvironmentThe Pachamama Alliance: $499,500 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $464,250 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH: $445,000 · Environment+20 more: $6,601,819 · Environment+20 moreLand is Life Inc: $4,387,160 · OtherLand is Life IncFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,850,000 · OtherFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INCThe Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation: $2,817,134 · Other+76 more: $39,105,163 · Other+76 moreGLOBAL WHOLE BEING FUND: $3,425,000 · InternationalCenter for Third World Organizing: $2,038,944 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $868,749 · InternationalROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER: $704,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $605,115 · InternationalPeace Development Fund: $526,700 · InternationalGroundswell International Inc: $510,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $470,136 · InternationalTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $459,500 · International+11 more: $2,822,843 · International
Philanthropy$32,281,950Human Services$20,893,517Food & Nutrition$20,047,504Community Improvement$14,067,695Environment$13,290,567Other$54,159,457International$12,430,987

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $9,190,843 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,850,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC: $6,881,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetLIVING LANDS TRUST: $6,823,472 over 7y, 82% of budgetTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION: $4,760,084 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetLand is Life Inc: $4,387,160 over 8y, 39% of budgetGLOBAL WHOLE BEING FUND: $3,425,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $3,200,315 over 6y, 13% of budgetNational Black Food and Justice Alliance: $3,158,514 over 3y, 20% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $3,145,821 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetThe Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation: $2,817,134 over 8y, 41% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $2,369,753 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON IMPACT INITIATIVE FUND: $2,264,902 over 3y, 60% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $2,038,944 over 4y, 13% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub: $1,968,700 over 5y, 46% of budgetFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES: $1,905,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $1,817,229 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $1,764,477 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetJUBILEE JUSTICE INC: $1,741,162 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,718,994 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $1,664,600 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,628,748 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetFriends International Inc: $1,580,000 over 7y, 61% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $1,542,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $1,450,840 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $1,343,650 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetCULTURAL SURVIVAL INC: $1,331,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $1,324,810 over 6y, 41% of budgetCanticle Farm: $1,314,372 over 8y, 30% of budgetThe Farm School Inc: $1,281,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $1,215,500 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA: $1,200,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetQUEER ASTERISK: $1,131,600 over 5y, 28% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $1,130,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $1,080,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $1,075,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHealth in Harmony: $1,022,847 over 8y, 18% of budgetIMPACT CHARITABLE: $1,007,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMONWEAL: $952,847 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $914,422 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $890,874 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $886,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetNaropa University: $881,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSIMAMA INTERNATIONAL: $880,000 over 8y, 45% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $875,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $868,749 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY: $833,185 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOOSE LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING LANDS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Land is Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL WHOLE BEING FUND ↗
  • Who funds EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE ↗
  • Who funds National Black Food and Justice Alliance ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON IMPACT INITIATIVE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds Higher Purpose Hub ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds HAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends International Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Canticle Farm ↗
  • Who funds The Farm School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds QUEER ASTERISK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Health in Harmony ↗
  • Who funds QUIPA INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT CHARITABLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Common Counsel Founda…The Schmidt Family Fo…Novo FoundationThe Triskeles Foundat…Amalgamated Charitabl…Possibility LabsMovement Strategy Cen…Windward FundSolidaire Network IncClif Family FoundationImpactassetsincNdn Collective Inc
Common Counsel FoundationCA98.3× affinity131 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Common Counsel Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Novo Foundation · The Triskeles Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Possibility Labs · Movement Strategy Center · Windward Fund · Solidaire Network Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Ndn Collective Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rsf Social Finance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rsf Social Finance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Presencing Institute Inc: 28% of income from government
  • The Farm School Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Farm and Wilderness Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1357 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rsf Social Finance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home