Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Royal Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$103kHuman Services$78kYouth Development$42kPhilanthropy$35kReligion$31kRecreation & Sports$26kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE FUND$6,000
SALVATION ARMY HENDRYGLADES$6,000
REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC$5,500
GLADES DAY SCHOOL$5,000
MARS HILL UNIVERSITY$4,000
DUNKLIN MEMORIAL CHURCH INC$4,000
VSA ARTS FOR FLORIDA$3,000
WORLD HARVEST OUTREACH$3,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST PETERS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
GLADES EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
PROJECT LIFT$1,500
GUADALUPE CENTER$1,500
THE ARC OF THE GLADES$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OUR SISTERS PLACE: $2k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $6k → 10%OUR VILLAGE OKEECHOBEE: $750 → 18%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $3k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $2k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $2k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $2k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $2k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $1k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $1k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $1k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $1k → 10%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $500 → 10%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $1k → 11%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $1k → 11%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $1k → 11%THE ARC OF THE GLADES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Royal Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 72% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Royal Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$389k · 43 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
6

Total granted

$389k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-2%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GD
    GLADES DAY SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +60%
  • MH
    MARS HILL UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +9%
  • REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY WPB
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF WPB GLADES
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • OS
    Our Sisters Place Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida High School for Accelerated Learning - North Lee Campus

The organization helps at-risk students earn standard high school diplomas and prepare for post-secondary success.

Education
2
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
3
Step Up for Students - Florida Inc

Step up for students empowers families to pursue and engage in the most appropriate learning options for their children, with an emphasis on families who lack the information and financial resources to access these options. by pursuing…

Education
4
North Florida School of Special Education Inc

To discover and foster each student's unique abilities revealing their highest potential within an engaged community.

5
Hearing & Speech Center of Florida Inc

The organization was incorporated in 1937 and reincorporated in 1961 to provide diagnosis and treatment for individuals of all ages with speech, language and hearing disabilities through its centers in South Florida needing speech,…

Health
6
Galaxy Education Inc

To operate a charter school in pinellas county, florida.

Education
7
Dreamers Academy Inc

Dreamers academy develops bilingual, biliterate, and cross-cultural leaders of character within a caring environment that encourages family engagement and celebrates america.

Youth Development
8
South Florida After-School All Stars Inc

Help children and youth achieve their maximum potential and reduce school dropout levels and crime.

Youth Development
9
South Florida Autism Charter Schools Inc

To operate a charter school in miami-dade county, florida.

10
The Florida Charter Educational Foundation Inc

The foundation provides high quality schools with an unwavering dedication to student achievement unyielding commitment to ethical and sound business practices providing a choice for communities, parents, students and professionals that…

Education
11
Sonshine Day Preschool Inc

Sonshine day preschools mission is to partner with the home and church to provide a loving, secure christian environment where dedicated staff care for, nuture, and teach young children to know, honor, and serve god.

12
Chase Academy Inc

The mission of The Chase Academy, a private K-12 school for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, is to provide the academic and independent living skills required to maximize each child's capacity for living independently as adults,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Southwest Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wolverine Band Parents Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr22%29%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr9%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr22%18%10–20yr18%12%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr9%53%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
15%
2,177/14,617

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE FUND — $35,027 · OtherRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE FUNDSALVATION ARMY HENDRYGLADES — $33,856 · OtherSALVATION ARMY HENDRYGLADESDUNKLIN MEMORIAL CHURCH INC — $25,428 · OtherDUNKLIN MEMORIAL CHURCH INCFORT WALTON HIGH SCHOOL — $21,770 · OtherFORT WALTON HIGH SCHOOLWORLD HARVEST OUTREACH — $19,928 · OtherWORLD HARVEST OUTREACHIndividual grant recipient — $12,756 · OtherPLEASANT HEIGHTS MISSIONARY CHURCH — $10,000 · Other+26 more — $107,312 · Other+26 moreGLADES DAY SCHOOL — $24,264 · EducationGLADES DAY SCHOOLMARS HILL UNIVERSITY — $21,099 · EducationMARS HILL UNIVERSITYGLADES EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,757 · EducationGLADES EDUCATION FOUN…CLEWISTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $9,170 · EducationCLEWISTON CHRISTIAN S…WOLVERINE BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION — $6,257 · EducationWOLVERINE BAND PARENT…HOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC — $4,586 · EducationHOBE SOUND BIBLE COLL…+1 more — $2,000 · EducationREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC — $16,842 · Human ServicesREDLANDS …Guadalupe Center Inc — $7,171 · Human ServicesGuadalupe…The Arc of The Glades — $6,671 · Human ServicesThe Arc o…Our Sisters Place Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesOur Siste…+1 more — $750 · Human ServicesGLADES YOUTH CONNECTION INC — $8,171 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT LIFT INC — $6,671 · Youth DevelopmentFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc — $3,586 · Youth DevelopmentRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $10,000 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc — $7,171 · Recreation & SportsEmerald Coast Fitness Foundation — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKE WORTH LAGOON ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentARTS4ALL FLORIDA INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$266,077Education$78,133Human Services$33,434Youth Development$18,428Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$8,171Environment$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLADES DAY SCHOOL — $24,264 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARS HILL UNIVERSITY — $21,099 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC — $16,842 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLADES EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,757 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEWISTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $9,170 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGLADES YOUTH CONNECTION INC — $8,171 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $7,171 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc — $7,171 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LIFT INC — $6,671 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arc of The Glades — $6,671 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOLVERINE BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION — $6,257 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetHOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC — $4,586 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSWAIN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC — $4,086 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $4,086 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc — $3,586 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOur Sisters Place Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALOOSA HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE WORTH LAGOON ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTS4ALL FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR VILLAGE OKEECHOBEE INC — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLADES DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds MARS HILL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds GLADES EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND
  • Who funds CLEWISTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds GLADES YOUTH CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC
  • Who funds The Arc of The Glades
  • Who funds WOLVERINE BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds SWAIN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC
  • Who funds YMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

He Hill Foundation IncFL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: He Hill Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Hand Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Royal Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc51% of income from government
  • ARTS4ALL Florida Inc1% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph