Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rothstein Mishkin Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$50kPhilanthropy$26kReligion$15kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$10kScience & Tech$7kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,040
Median grant
4
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBC$5,000
PAP CORPS$5,000
SSP INTERNATIONAL$1,710
RUTH AND NORMAN RALES JFS$1,550
WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$1,338
CROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION$1,040
JARC FLORIDA$1,000
THE ARGYROS$1,000
THE ELEANOR KAPLAN FOUNDATION$1,000
PLAY FOR PINK$300
BOCA HELPING HANDS$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $650 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $100 → 12%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NY
CA
UT
CO
DE
AZ
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$91k · 24 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
34

Total granted

$91k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+19%

Still filing today

42%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +176%
  • WR
    WOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +25%
  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SC
    SYLVESTER CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MS
    MT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

3
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
4
The Boulder Jewish Community Center

We are a home for community that builds relationships, embraces differences, and embodies what jewish life can be.

Human Services
5
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
6
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
7
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
8
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

9
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
10
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

11
Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc

Jewish summer camp is the enduring and irreplaceable connection and community that strengthens jewish identity, develops jewish leadership, and ensures a jewish future. foundation for jewish camp (fjc) is the only nonprofit whose singular…

Youth Development
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersClassical Music EnsemblesIndependent K-8 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Food Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr15%36%20–35yr9%8%35–55yr12%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%1%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%31%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr9%15%35–55yr12%28%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,017

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PAP CORPS — $18,985 · OtherPAP CORPSWOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $14,338 · OtherWOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERSYLVESTER CANCER CENTER — $10,000 · OtherSYLVESTER CANCER CENTERMT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · OtherMT SINAI MEDICAL CENTERJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH CTY — $8,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH CTYDAMON RUNYON FOUNDATION — $5,100 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBC — $5,000 · Other+44 more — $38,805 · Other+44 moreMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc — $7,400 · HealthMorgan Pr…Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $2,650 · HealthBoca Rato…ELEANOR KAPLAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · HealthELEANOR K…ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC — $500 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $6,000 · PhilanthropyWOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $3,700 · PhilanthropyIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,100 · Philanthropy+1 more — $118 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $5,000 · InternationalJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC — $3,875 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $2,325 · Human ServicesSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $500 · Human ServicesFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC — $100 · Human ServicesSSP INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,710 · EducationPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · Education
Other$110,228Health$11,750Philanthropy$10,918International$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,875Human Services$2,925Education$2,710

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc — $7,400 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC — $3,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $3,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $2,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $2,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO BASE CAMP INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds SSP INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC
  • Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds IDAHO BASE CAMP INC
  • Who funds ELEANOR KAPLAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Thrasher Koffey Foundation · The Nalen Foundation · Martin Djos Family Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · The Pesky Family Foundation Inc · The Springcreek Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rothstein Mishkin Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc1% of income from government
  • Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph