Skip to content
Rotary International District 5030 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5030

Rotary is a Worldwide Service Organization.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$127kCommunity Improvement$100kEducation$98kInternational$89kHuman Services$57kYouth Development$39kHealth$37kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $73,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $131,600 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $58,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$319k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lynnwood Rotary Community Foundation$16,000
University Rotary Service Fund$8,000
Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Foundation$8,000
Bellevue Breakfast Rotary Club Foundation$8,000
University Sunrise Rotary Service Foundation$8,000
Foundation of The Rotary Club of Mercer Island$8,000
Seattle Rotary Service Foundation$6,000
Rotary Club of the Pacific Northwest - Ending Sex Trafficking$5,850
Seattle Rotary Service Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9k → 9%Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Foundation: $8k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY: $8k → 9%SEATTLE -INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB: $8k → 9%MERCER ISLAND ROTARY FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%Foundation of The Rotary Club of Mercer Island: $8k → 9%Foundation Of The Rotary Club Of Mercer Island: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Rotary International District 5030’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 52%.

Rotary International District 5030lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 37% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$365k · 13 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$365k
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    University Rotary Service Fund
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +84%
  • LF
    Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found
    5× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +43%
  • LU
    LAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MC
    MILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +132% · 28% of their budget
  • RF
    RCKD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • BB
    BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rotary Club of Snoqualmie Valley

Service and funding to various organizations throughout our community and worldwide.

Human Services
2
Rotary Foundation of the South Puget Sound Rotary Club
Education
3
Charitable Foundation of the Rotary Club of Tacoma North State
—
4
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Oregon City Rotary Club Foundation

Assist education of youth and help children and communities internationally

Community Improvement
6
Washington Rotary Foundation

Service organization

Public Benefit
7
Mount Vernon Rotary Club Foundation

Community service

Philanthropy
8
Lewis River Rotary Foundation

To transform gifts into service projects that change lives both close to home and around the world.

Philanthropy
9
Rotary Club of Bellingham Foundation

Provide grants to nonprofits in the local community and scholarships for local students.

Education
10
Greater Clark County Rotary Foundation

Net proceeds from fundraisers used to support educational, civic and humanitarian projects world wide.

Philanthropy
11
Murray Rotary Club Foundation
—
12
Cleburne Rotary Club Foundation Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bellevue Rotary Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lake Union Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University Rotary Service Fund: $49,963 · Community ImprovementUniversity Rotary Service FundSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $32,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATI…BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $26,750 · Community ImprovementBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB …Rotary Club of Emerald City Foundation: $26,000 · Community ImprovementRotary Club of Emerald City Fou…MILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementMILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATIONMaple Valley Rotary Foundation: $10,000 · Community ImprovementMaple Valley Rotary FoundationRENTON ROTARY CAPER INC: $7,300 · Community ImprovementDES MOINES NORMANDY PARK ROTARY: $6,000 · Community ImprovementBellevue Sunrise Rotary Foundation: $24,000 · OtherBellevue Sunrise Rotary F…University Sunrise Rotary Service Founda: $18,710 · OtherUniversity Sunrise Rotary…FOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB OF ISSAQUAH: $18,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB…RCKD FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherRCKD FOUNDATIONBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY: $10,000 · OtherBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARYROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FO…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALROTARY CLUB OF PUGET SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF PUGET SOUN…BELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATIO…Rotary Club Of Magnolia Foundation: $7,825 · OtherRotary Club Of Magnolia F…Rotary Club of the Pacific Northwest - Ending Sex Trafficking: $5,850 · OtherSOUTHCENTER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,750 · OtherRotary Club PNW Partners for Work: $5,750 · OtherLake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found: $46,500 · Human ServicesLake Forest Par…FOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND: $28,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF T…SEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesSEATTLE-INTERNA…FEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $6,050 · Human ServicesFEDERAL WAY ROT…Ballard Rotary Foundation: $34,100 · EducationBallard Rota…Kirkland Rotary Foundation: $14,500 · EducationKirkland Rot…SHORELINE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSHORELINE RO…WOODINVILLE ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationWOODINVILLE …REDMOND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationREDMOND ROTA…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $68,750 · InternationalTHE ROTARY F…LAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY CLUB OF KENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRotary Club of Covington Foundation: $5,750 · PhilanthropyLynnwood Rotary Community Foundation: $22,000 · ReligionEDMONDS DAYBREAKERS FOUNDATION: $21,500 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$173,013Other$142,385Human Services$88,550Education$71,600International$68,750Philanthropy$40,750Religion$22,000Youth Development$21,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $68,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Rotary Service Fund: $49,963 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found: $46,500 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetBallard Rotary Foundation: $34,100 over 4y, 82% of budgetSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND: $28,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $26,750 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetRotary Club of Emerald City Foundation: $26,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetLAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetBellevue Sunrise Rotary Foundation: $24,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetLynnwood Rotary Community Foundation: $22,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetEDMONDS DAYBREAKERS FOUNDATION: $21,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetUniversity Sunrise Rotary Service Founda: $18,710 over 3y, 14% of budgetFOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB OF ISSAQUAH: $18,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetMILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetKirkland Rotary Foundation: $14,500 over 2y, 53% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF KENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSHORELINE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMaple Valley Rotary Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetWOODINVILLE ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRENTON ROTARY CAPER INC: $7,300 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $6,050 over 1y, 31% of budgetDES MOINES NORMANDY PARK ROTARY: $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRotary Club of Covington Foundation: $5,750 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetREDMOND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rotary Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary InternationalIL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 5030 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 5030. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 5030’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home