Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5030

Rotary is a Worldwide Service Organization.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$127kCommunity Improvement$100kEducation$98kInternational$89kHuman Services$57kYouth Development$39kHealth$37kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $73,350 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $131,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$319k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lynnwood Rotary Community Foundation$16,000
Bellevue Breakfast Rotary Club Foundation$8,000
Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Foundation$8,000
University Rotary Service Fund$8,000
University Sunrise Rotary Service Foundation$8,000
Foundation of The Rotary Club of Mercer Island$8,000
Seattle Rotary Service Foundation$6,000
Rotary Club of the Pacific Northwest - Ending Sex Trafficking$5,850
Seattle Rotary Service Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9k → 9%Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Foundation: $8k → 9%LAKE FOREST PARK ROTARY: $8k → 9%SEATTLE -INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB: $8k → 9%MERCER ISLAND ROTARY FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%Foundation of The Rotary Club of Mercer Island: $8k → 9%Foundation Of The Rotary Club Of Mercer Island: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Rotary International District 5030’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 52% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rotary International District 5030lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 37% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$365k · 13 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$365k
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    University Rotary Service Fund
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +84%
  • LF
    Lake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found
    5× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +43%
  • LU
    LAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MC
    MILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +132% · 28% of their budget
  • RF
    RCKD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • BB
    BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rotary Club of Snoqualmie Valley

Service and funding to various organizations throughout our community and worldwide.

Human Services
2
Rotary Foundation of the South Puget Sound Rotary Club
Education
3
Charitable Foundation of the Rotary Club of Tacoma North State
4
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Oregon City Rotary Club Foundation

Assist education of youth and help children and communities internationally

Community Improvement
6
Washington Rotary Foundation

Service organization

Public Benefit
7
Mount Vernon Rotary Club Foundation

Community service

Philanthropy
8
Lewis River Rotary Foundation

To transform gifts into service projects that change lives both close to home and around the world.

Philanthropy
9
Rotary Club of Bellingham Foundation

Provide grants to nonprofits in the local community and scholarships for local students.

Education
10
Greater Clark County Rotary Foundation

Net proceeds from fundraisers used to support educational, civic and humanitarian projects world wide.

Philanthropy
11
Murray Rotary Club Foundation
12
Cleburne Rotary Club Foundation Inc
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bellevue Rotary Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Lake Union Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University Rotary Service Fund — $49,963 · Community ImprovementUniversity Rotary Service FundSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $32,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATI…BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $26,750 · Community ImprovementBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB …Rotary Club of Emerald City Foundation — $26,000 · Community ImprovementRotary Club of Emerald City Fou…MILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Community ImprovementMILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATIONMaple Valley Rotary Foundation — $10,000 · Community ImprovementMaple Valley Rotary FoundationRENTON ROTARY CAPER INC — $7,300 · Community ImprovementDES MOINES NORMANDY PARK ROTARY — $6,000 · Community ImprovementBellevue Sunrise Rotary Foundation — $24,000 · OtherBellevue Sunrise Rotary F…University Sunrise Rotary Service Founda — $18,710 · OtherUniversity Sunrise Rotary…FOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB OF ISSAQUAH — $18,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB…RCKD FOUNDATION — $12,000 · OtherRCKD FOUNDATIONBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY — $10,000 · OtherBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARYROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $9,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FO…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $9,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATIO…ROTARY CLUB OF PUGET SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF PUGET SOUN…Rotary Club Of Magnolia Foundation — $7,825 · OtherRotary Club Of Magnolia F…Rotary Club of the Pacific Northwest - Ending Sex Trafficking — $5,850 · OtherSOUTHCENTER ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,750 · OtherRotary Club PNW Partners for Work — $5,750 · OtherLake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found — $46,500 · Human ServicesLake Forest Par…FOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $28,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF T…SEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Human ServicesSEATTLE-INTERNA…FEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $6,050 · Human ServicesFEDERAL WAY ROT…Ballard Rotary Foundation — $34,100 · EducationBallard Rota…Kirkland Rotary Foundation — $14,500 · EducationKirkland Rot…SHORELINE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSHORELINE RO…WOODINVILLE ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · EducationWOODINVILLE …REDMOND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationREDMOND ROTA…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $68,750 · InternationalTHE ROTARY F…LAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY CLUB OF KENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyRotary Club of Covington Foundation — $5,750 · PhilanthropyLynnwood Rotary Community Foundation — $22,000 · ReligionEDMONDS DAYBREAKERS FOUNDATION — $21,500 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$173,013Other$142,385Human Services$88,550Education$71,600International$68,750Philanthropy$40,750Religion$22,000Youth Development$21,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $68,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Rotary Service Fund — $49,963 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLake Forest Park Rotary Charitable Found — $46,500 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetBallard Rotary Foundation — $34,100 over 4y, 82% of budgetSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $32,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $28,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $26,750 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetRotary Club of Emerald City Foundation — $26,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetLAKE UNION ROTARY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetBellevue Sunrise Rotary Foundation — $24,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetLynnwood Rotary Community Foundation — $22,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetEDMONDS DAYBREAKERS FOUNDATION — $21,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetUniversity Sunrise Rotary Service Founda — $18,710 over 3y, 14% of budgetFOUNDATION OF ROTARY CLUB OF ISSAQUAH — $18,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetMILL CREEK ROTARY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetKirkland Rotary Foundation — $14,500 over 2y, 53% of budgetSHORELINE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF KENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetMaple Valley Rotary Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetWOODINVILLE ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetRENTON ROTARY CAPER INC — $7,300 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $6,050 over 1y, 31% of budgetDES MOINES NORMANDY PARK ROTARY — $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRotary Club of Covington Foundation — $5,750 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetREDMOND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rotary Foundation of Rotary InternationalIL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary International District 5030 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph