Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary International

Community Service Projects, supporting economic development within Jefferson County, Missouri, providing scholarships to deserving young people in our local school districts, and supporting other charitable events and causes in our community and our nation.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

International$11kEnvironment$5kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kAnimals$2kYouth Development$2kCommunity Improvement$500Religion$500
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $3,642 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,884 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,242 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$517
Median grant
3
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Rotary Foundation$2,125
James II Project$517
Samaritans Purse$500
Rotary District 7680$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Feed My People Pantry: $1k → 9%Feed My People Pantry: $333 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17k · 5 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$17k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+20%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24’25
Food & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +18%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +80%
  • FM
    FEED MY PEOPLE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6060
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • MK
    MISSOURI KIDS UNPLUGGED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +93%
  • RD
    Rotary District 5000 Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

2
Rotary International Ste Genevieve Rotary Club

To provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

3
Rotary International

The mission of rotary international is to provide servicve to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through its fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

4
Rotary International District 5750

Provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill and peace through the fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

5
Rotary District 6740 John Hutchings

The mission of rotary district 6470 is to provide service to others, to advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through its fellowship of business professionals and community leaders.

6
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

7
Rotary International District 6800

The mission of rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

8
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
9
Rotary International District 5440 Foundation

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

10
Rotary International

The texarkana oaklawn rotary club's mission is to provide humanitiarian service, encourage high ethichal standards, and help build goodwill and peace in the world and locally.

11
Rotary International District 6040

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

12
Rotary International

Rotary international has more than 45,000 members worldwide to work together to promote peace, fight disease, provide clean water, save mothers and children, support education, grow local economies, and protect the environment.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My People and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $11,165 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6060 — $4,500 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6060OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,136 · OtherOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARYDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY INC — $1,333 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $1,000 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherMISSOURI KIDS UNPLUGGED INC — $2,075 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PEACE PANTRY — $1,333 · Food & NutritionJAMES II PROJECT CORP — $517 · Food & NutritionFEED MY PEOPLE — $1,333 · Human ServicesRotary District 5000 Foundation — $1,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 · Religion
Other$20,634Youth Development$2,075Food & Nutrition$1,850Human Services$1,333Education$1,000Religion$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $11,165 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6060 — $4,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,136 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI KIDS UNPLUGGED INC — $2,075 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE — $1,333 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEACE PANTRY — $1,333 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRotary District 5000 Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES II PROJECT CORP — $517 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jefferson FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jefferson Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary International?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph