Loading…
· Public charity
ROSWELL WOMAN'S CLUB INC
The roswell woman's club is an all-volunteer, not-for-profit service organization whose common interest is to support our community in the areas of educational scholarships and grants, human services, cultural arts, historical preservation, and urban improvement.
$183k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Human Services$15kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$5kEnvironment$5kOther$12k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
livestherapyeducatingeducationwholechildrenindependence
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$5,535
Median grant
1
States reached
$68k
Total assets
Largest grants
- CAMBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL$5,535
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Pta North Carolina Congress
The purpose of PTA is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children. We are a nonprofit organization comprised of parents and staff working together to enrich the…
—
2
Pta North Carolina Congress
The overall purpose of PTA is to make every childs potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children
—
3
Pta Georgia Congress
To promote the welfare of children and youth
Education
4
Pta Georgia Congress Ridgeview Middle School Pta
Support and enrich the students of Ridgeview Middle School.
—
5
Pta Georgia Congress - King Springs Es Pta
To make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children. PTA Values. Collaboration: We work in partnership with a wide array of individuals and organizations to accomplish…
—
6
Pta North Carolina Congress
The overall purpose of PTA is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
—
7
Pta North Carolina Congress
The Pollard Parent Teacher Association: The purposes of this local PTA, in common with those of National PTA and NCPTA are: a. To promote the welfare of children and youth in home, school, community, and place of worship; b. To raise the…
—
8
Pta Texas Congress
National PTA's Vision is making every child's potential a reality. Our mission as a national chapter is to be: A powerful voice for all children, A relevant resource for families and communities, A strong advocate for the education and…
—
9
Pta Georgia Congress - Liberty Es Pta
The mission of the PTA is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
—
10
Pta Georgia Congress
—
11
Pta Georgia Congress
To make every child's potential a realty by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
—
12
Dunwoody High School Parent Teacher
Enrich students and faculty at dunwoody high school
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Services North Fulton Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Summit Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$15,000Other$11,535Housing & Shelter$6,000Health$5,000Environment$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DRAKE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES NORTH FULTON INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY ↗
- Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Frances Wood Wilson Foundation IncGA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family · Community Foundation for Northeast · The Community Foundation for Greater · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROSWELL WOMAN'S CLUB INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOUNTAIN PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 581305050 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MOUNTAIN PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Roswell Woman's Club Inc?
Find your warmest path to Roswell Woman's Club Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines