Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosemann Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$958k
Granted FY2026still arriving
66
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MEnvironment$712kFood & Nutrition$326kEducation$289kAnimals$176kPhilanthropy$154kReligion$121kHuman Services$70kOther$0
02FY2026 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k50 grants · $220k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $650k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Easter Seals$100,000
Easter Seals$100,000
United Way of Greater Milwaukee$65,000
United Way of Greater Milwaukee$65,000
Harry Chapin Food Bank$55,000
Milwaukee Art Museum$55,000
Milwaukee Art Museum$55,000
Harry Chapin Food Bank$55,000
UW FOUNDATION$50,000
UW FOUNDATION$50,000
AM RED CROSS RENO$22,000
AM RED CROSS RENO$22,000
Shriners Hospital Northern CA$12,000
Shriners Hospital Northern CA$12,000
Gladiolus food Pantry$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Community Cooperative: $5k → 11%New Horizons of Southwest Florida: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WI
NY
MA
NV
IA
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 49 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2026, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
21

Total granted

$3.6M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHERN SKY THEATER INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $433k · revenue +37%
  • TR
    THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $408k · revenue +98%
  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $289k · revenue +166%

Funded once

  • HH
    Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +64%
  • CF
    Community Foundation Collier County
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee World Festival Inc

The corporation shall be a civic organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including in furtherance thereof, the production of an annual festival in the milwaukee metropolitan…

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
4
Wisconsin Public Radio Association Inc

The purpose of the wisconsin public radio association (wpra) is to support wisconsin public radio by engaging in cooperative fundraising, stewardship and advocacy. the wpra generates support through programs and participatory activities…

Arts & Culture
5
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
6
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
7
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
8
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
9
Minnesota Orchestral Association

The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
11
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
12
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe Embrace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Easter Seals: $200,000 · OtherEaster SealsMilwaukee Zoological Society: $137,900 · OtherMilwaukee Zoological SocietyIONA HOPE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $110,795 · OtherIONA HOPE EPISCOPAL CHURCHSIX MILE CYRESS SLOUGH PRESERVE: $101,000 · OtherSIX MILE CYRESS SLOUGH PRESERVEFOOD BANK OF N NEVADA: $95,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF N NEVADAHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $93,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCFlorida Gulf Coast Univerisity: $65,000 · OtherAM RED CROSS RENO: $59,000 · Other+45 more: $486,950 · Other+45 moreNORTHERN SKY THEATER INC: $433,085 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN SKY THEATER INCMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $288,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INCMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $137,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $100,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee IncMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $47,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $121,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $407,987 · AnimalsTHE RIDGES S…WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $33,500 · AnimalsWISCONSIN HU…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $258,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $7,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $215,000 · PhilanthropyThe United Way of Lee County Inc: $68,500 · PhilanthropyHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $135,000 · Food & NutritionGLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INC: $57,000 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $56,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $200,000 · Environment+1 more: $4,500 · Environment
Other$1,348,645Arts & Culture$1,201,585Animals$441,487Education$302,500Philanthropy$283,500Food & Nutrition$278,000Environment$204,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN SKY THEATER INC: $433,085 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $407,987 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $288,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $258,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $215,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $200,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $137,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $93,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc: $68,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $56,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $47,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA REPERTORY COMPANY INC: $37,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $36,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetReno Chamber Orchestra Inc: $29,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA WOMEN'S FUND: $7,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $3,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE EMBRACE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANDLELIGHTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNEW HORIZONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN SKY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds The United Way of Lee County Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLADIOLUS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA REPERTORY COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Reno Chamber Orchestra Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI16.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Door County Community Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemann Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemann Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosemann Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph