Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rordor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$148kYouth Development$113kReligion$57kCivil Rights$50kAnimals$25kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$10kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC PARISH$2,000
WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
GRACE YOUTH CAMP$2,000
CHABAD HOUSE OF WEST MICHIGAN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $6k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $6k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$373k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+108%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • WC
    WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +52%
  • GL
    GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • JB
    JOHN BALL ZOOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +252%
  • RP
    RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +90%
  • Michigan Colleges Alliancegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +108%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Right Place Inc

The right place is the economic development organization that drives current and long-term economic prosperity in west michigan.

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
American Anglican Council

Aac's purpose is to build up and defend great commission anglican churches in north america through developing faithful leaders, equipping local churches and engaging the church and culture with gospel clarity.

Religion
4
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
5
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
6
Grove City Christian Academy

To assist christian parents in their task of bringing up children to the glory of god, by means of instruction in the classical disciplines under the universal lordship of christ.

Education
7
The Wellspring Group

Wellspring provides a discipleship model for individuals and churches to engage as a part of their overall spiritual development. this is done through retreat and small group experiences and through equipping churches and organizations to…

Religion
8
Westminster Academy

The school provides classical christian education to students in grades junior kindergarten through twelve.

Education
9
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
10
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
11
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
12
West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central minnesota.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Adventures; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Colleges Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE YOUTH CAMP: $113,000 · OtherGRACE YOUTH CAMPSALVATION ARMY: $78,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $25,000 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INCCHABAD HOUSE OF WEST MICHIGAN: $23,000 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF WEST MICHIGANDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $15,000 · OtherSACRED HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC PARISH: $14,000 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $11,000 · OtherActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $50,000 · Civil RightsActon Institu…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $35,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD …JOHN BALL ZOO: $25,000 · AnimalsRIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementGRACE ADVENTURES: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMichigan Colleges Alliance: $10,000 · Education
Other$289,000Civil Rights$50,000Human Services$35,000Animals$25,000Community Improvement$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $35,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BALL ZOO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE ADVENTURES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMichigan Colleges Alliance: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO ↗
  • Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRACE ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Colleges Alliance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter C & Emajean Cook FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Mojo Foundation · Steve & Amy Van Andel Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Ufp Industries Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rordor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rordor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rordor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph