Skip to content
Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc

See schedule oronald mcdonald house charities of ohio valley is a nonprofit organization that is dedicated to fulfilling its mission through core programs.

$38k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Human Services$36kYouth Development$9kHealth$8kEducation$5kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,706
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARK CRISIS CHILD CARE CENTER$9,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB EVANSVILLE$8,750
OWENSBORO HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,706
LITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE$5,000
KYNDLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
YWCA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $10k → 15%YWCA: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
2
Kentucky Intensive Family Services Inc

To provide a safe environment for children.

—
3
Early Childhood Learning Educa Assessment Resource Network Inc

Providing education & support for those working in early education and child care. ec learn inspires & equips families, professionals, and community learders to prioritize early childhood education for a

Education
4
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
5
Baby Health Services Inc

Provide free quality health care for the uninsured children of central kentucky.

Health
6
Kiddie Garden Learning Acadeny Inc

To provide the highest level of early care and education to the youth of Indiana

Education
7
New Beginnings Child Care of Montgomery County Indiana Inc

A Childcare Ministry providing exciting learning opportunities for the children in our care in a safe nurturing Christian environment while allowing for unique individual growth.

Human Services
8
The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Susie's Place promotes the prevention, justice and healing of child victims of abuse and violence while maintaining the comfort and safety of the child as the first priority.

Youth Development
9
Little Thinkers Inc

Our mission is to prepare the children of our community for the road ahead. We take a whole-child approach that blends personalized care plans with physical play, social development, and academic readiness.

Human Services
10
The Vine Early Learning Inc

The organization is formed to provide child-care for infants to five year- olds in the steuben county, indiana area.

Human Services
11
Louisville Preschool Inc

Preschool and daycare center

—
12
Bentonville Child Care and Development Center Inc

Our purpose is to serve families by providing quality care and education for children six weeks of age through pre-kindergarten in a non-profit child development center and preschool.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Evansville Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Lambs of Evansville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIDDIE KARE MINISTRY & PRESCHOOL CO: $14,703 · EducationKIDDIE KARE MINISTRY & PRESCHOOL COHENDERSON KY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationHENDERSON KY EDUCATION FOUNDATION I…United Methodist Youth Home Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Youth…YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF EVANSVILLE IND…ARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC: $9,000 · Crime & LegalARK CRISIS PREVE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $8,750 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CL…Owensboro Health Foundation Inc: $7,706 · HealthOwensboro Hea…LITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementLITTLE LA…
Education$19,703Human Services$12,500Crime & Legal$9,000Other$8,750Health$7,706Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOwensboro Health Foundation Inc: $7,706 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …James R Duncan Trust …Evansville Endowment …Baird Foundation IncFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Alliance IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home