Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc

See schedule oronald mcdonald house charities of ohio valley is a nonprofit organization that is dedicated to fulfilling its mission through core programs.

$38k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172018.

Education$20kHuman Services$13kCrime & Legal$9kHealth$8kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$9k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,706
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARK CRISIS CHILD CARE CENTER$9,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB EVANSVILLE$8,750
OWENSBORO HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,706
LITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE$5,000
KYNDLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
YWCA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $10k → 15%YWCA: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
2
Kentucky Intensive Family Services Inc

To provide a safe environment for children.

3
Early Childhood Learning Educa Assessment Resource Network Inc

Providing education & support for those working in early education and child care. ec learn inspires & equips families, professionals, and community learders to prioritize early childhood education for a

Education
4
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
5
New Beginnings Child Care of Montgomery County Indiana Inc

A Childcare Ministry providing exciting learning opportunities for the children in our care in a safe nurturing Christian environment while allowing for unique individual growth.

Human Services
6
Kiddie Garden Learning Acadeny Inc

To provide the highest level of early care and education to the youth of Indiana

Education
7
Baby Health Services Inc

Provide free quality health care for the uninsured children of central kentucky.

Health
8
Little Thinkers Inc

Our mission is to prepare the children of our community for the road ahead. We take a whole-child approach that blends personalized care plans with physical play, social development, and academic readiness.

Human Services
9
The Vine Early Learning Inc

The organization is formed to provide child-care for infants to five year- olds in the steuben county, indiana area.

Human Services
10
The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Susie's Place promotes the prevention, justice and healing of child victims of abuse and violence while maintaining the comfort and safety of the child as the first priority.

Youth Development
11
Louisville Preschool Inc

Preschool and daycare center

12
Kidz Luv Early Learning Ministry Inc

To provide a quality, safe developmentally appropriate environment for children, infants through 5 years of age. our focus is to provide a stimulating early child care and education experience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Evansville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little Lambs of Evansville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIDDIE KARE MINISTRY & PRESCHOOL CO — $14,703 · EducationKIDDIE KARE MINISTRY & PRESCHOOL COHENDERSON KY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationHENDERSON KY EDUCATION FOUNDATION I…United Methodist Youth Home Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Youth…YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF EVANSVILLE IND…ARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC — $9,000 · Crime & LegalARK CRISIS PREVE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC — $8,750 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CL…Owensboro Health Foundation Inc — $7,706 · HealthOwensboro Hea…LITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE INC — $5,000 · Community ImprovementLITTLE LA…
Education$19,703Human Services$12,500Crime & Legal$9,000Other$8,750Health$7,706Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC — $9,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC — $8,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOwensboro Health Foundation Inc — $7,706 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE LAMBS OF EVANSVILLE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Alliance IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Ohio Valley Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph