Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald J Anania Family Foundation Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2021
16
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Religion$61kRecreation & Sports$23kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$6kEducation$4kAnimals$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k15 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN VIANNEY PARISH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
ST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCH$7,000
ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
FAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH$4,000
GENEVA FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH$4,000
FEEDING CHITTENDEN$2,500
COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER$2,500
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
UNITY CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST$2,000
THE ALLIANCE COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
GENEVA HISPANIC CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST$2,000
SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$1,500
KIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 10%GENEVA FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 9 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +190% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$69k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+190%
+74%

Still filing today

22%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EW
    ENDICOTT WOMEN'S ICE HOCKEY PROGRAM
    2× · 2019–2020 · $23k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN VIANNEY PARISH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $14k
  • SP
    ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2021 · $7k

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +222%
  • MO
    MOUNT OLIVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH OF GENEVA
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • BA
    BEVERLY ANIMAL SHELTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
2
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
3
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
4
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
5
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
6
Vermont Achievement Center Inc

Through flexible, diverse and responsive programs, vermont achievement center, inc. (vac) provides a foundation of life skills to prepare individuals to reach their full potential as contributing members of society. all people are capable…

Education
7
The Children's Aid Society

Children's aid helps children in poverty to succeed and thrive. we do this by providing comprehensive supports to children and their families in targeted, high-needs new york city neighborhoods. (continued on schedule o)continuation of…

Human Services
8
Westchester Community Opportunity Program Inc

To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.

Community Improvement
9
Community Housing Innovations Inc

Founded in 1991, community housing innovations, inc. (chi) is a not-for-profit organization serving several new york counties. chi's mission is to provide housing and human services that support social and economic independence. chi's…

—
10
Vermont Family Network Inc

Vfn's mission is to empower and support all vermont families of children with special needs.

Human Services
11
Elevate Youth Services Inc

Elevate's mission is to promote safety, competence, and confidence as youth create their path through adolescence and into adulthood.elevate provides a wide range of innovative and effective programs that empower and enrich the lives of…

Human Services
12
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endicott College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENDICOTT WOMEN'S ICE HOCKEY PROGRAM: $23,000 · OtherENDICOTT WOMEN'S ICE HOCKEY PROGRAMST JOHN VIANNEY PARISH: $14,000 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY PARISHIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCHST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6,500 · OtherST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCHGENEVA FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherFAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherUNITY CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST: $4,000 · OtherGENEVA HISPANIC CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST: $4,000 · OtherTHE ALLIANCE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherMOUNT OLIVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH OF GENEVA: $3,500 · Other+15 more: $17,600 · Other+15 moreCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $4,500 · Community ImprovementBEVERLY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,000 · AnimalsSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $1,500 · Public BenefitKIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$102,600Housing & Shelter$10,000Community Improvement$4,500Animals$3,000Human Services$3,000Public Benefit$1,500Crime & Legal$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBEVERLY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE TO SURVIVE ORGANIZATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE TO SURVIVE ORGANIZATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald J Anania Family Foundation Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald J Anania Family Foundation Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Kidsafe Collaborative Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ronald J Anania Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph