Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ron and Marla Wolf Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$33kCommunity Improvement$18kHealth$18kEducation$8kEnvironment$6kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$459k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL SYNOGOGUE - GRANT$3,900
ATLANTIC THEATRE COMPANY$2,460
FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,003
GREENWICH HOUSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$344
CLIMATE RIDE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNITED HABITAT FUND: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 12 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$78k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+109%

Still filing today

42%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +29%
  • SR
    STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • HI
    HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • U
    USC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • CS
    CENTRAL SYNOGOGUE - MEMBERSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • AT
    ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
2
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
3
En Garde Arts Inc

To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
5
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment
6
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
7
Openhousenewyork Inc

The organization's purpose is to promote broad, unparalleled access to the city-to the places, people, projects, systems and ideas that define new york and its future-and fosters civic dialogue about how the city functions and who it…

Arts & Culture
8
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
9
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
10
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
11
The Associated Press Foundation for Journalism Inc

The foundation's mission is to produce, support and promote high-quality journalism focused on underserved issue and focus areas in order to educate and inform the public and ensure widespread, ongoing public access to educational,…

Arts & Culture
12
Hotel Association of New York City Inc

serving the hotel industry since 1878, the hotel association of new york city, inc. is one of the oldest professional trade associations in the nation. its founders mission was to establish an association that would serve as the voice of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ukrainian Habitat Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL SYNOGOGUE - GRANT: $17,500 · OtherCENTRAL SYNOGOGUE - GRANT7TH AVENUE SOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $14,250 · Other7TH AVENUE SOUTH ALLIANCE INCATLANTIC THEATRE COMPANY: $12,440 · OtherATLANTIC THEATRE COMPANYUSC: $7,500 · OtherUSCIndividual grant recipient: $4,084 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherCENTRAL SYNOGOGUE - MEMBERSHIP: $3,300 · Other+9 more: $6,033 · Other+9 moreFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSE…HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureHONESTREPORTINGCOM INCATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $3,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATER COMPA…STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE RIDE INC: $1,200 · EnvironmentATHLETE ALLY INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsUKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$68,607Arts & Culture$19,500Environment$6,200Recreation & Sports$1,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHLETE ALLY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ATHLETE ALLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ron and Marla Wolf Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ron and Marla Wolf Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Steep Rock Association Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ron and Marla Wolf Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ron and Marla Wolf Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ron and Marla Wolf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph