Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roger L Main Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$275kRecreation & Sports$65kHousing & Shelter$61kScience & Tech$7k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$4,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC$11,700
CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS$6,900
MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC$4,800
SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$4,500
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES: $5k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES: $5k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES O: $4k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE: $4k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES: $4k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES: $4k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE: $2k → 14%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE: $630 → 14%DEETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM: $17k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $17k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $14k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $14k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $12k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $12k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $12k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $12k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $8k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $8k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $7k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 14%CUMMER MUSEUM OF ART & GARDENS: $2k → 14%MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $29k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $29k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $23k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $23k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $20k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $20k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $12k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $11k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $11k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $9k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $9k → 14%I M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $8k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $8k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 14%JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOC: $4k → 14%SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 6 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$388k
$21k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $160k · revenue +159%
  • DE
    DE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +67%
  • IS
    IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $61k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • DH
    DEETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • NS
    NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES O
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc: $159,510 · Arts & CultureJacksonville Symphony Association IncDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $76,820 · Arts & CultureDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATIONTHE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE: $17,500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THEMEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $65,440 · OtherMEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION…DEETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM: $17,250 · OtherDEETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSE…NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE: $6,930 · OtherNATIONAL SOCIETY OF THENATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES O: $4,200 · OtherIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $61,350 · Housing & ShelterIM SULZBACHER CEN…
Arts & Culture$253,830Other$93,820Housing & Shelter$61,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJacksonville Symphony Association Inc: $159,510 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $76,820 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $65,440 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $61,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE: $17,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds DE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Haskell Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roger L Main Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger L Main Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • The National Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the: 28% of income from government
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roger L Main’s filings →

More from the funding graph