Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roger and Patty Harness Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$115kHuman Services$73kHousing & Shelter$55kPublic Benefit$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kEducation$26kReligion$16kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$398k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WITTS SPRINGS COMMUNITY VOICES$15,000
OZARK SHARE AND CARE$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,500
HOUSE OF HOPE$2,500
BOONE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY$2,500
OPERATION UNDERGROUND$1,000
HOSPICE OF THE HILLS$500
HARRISON HIGH SCHOOL$500
NORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%OZARK REGIONAL SHARE AND CARE PROGR: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 13 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$314k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+24%

Still filing today

15%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF HARRISON
    2× · 2019–2021 · $100k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $63k
  • WS
    WITTS SPRINGS COMMUNITY VOICES
    4× · 2019–2023 · $50k

Funded once

  • WS
    WITTS SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CY
    CONSOLIDATED YOUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BC
    BOONE COUNTY 4H FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
2
Arkansas Housing and Community Development Corporation

An instrumentality of north little rock housing authority to provide charitable, educational, and human services specifically related to the development, operations and management of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
Northwest Arkansas Council

Promotion of the growth, vitality, and development of northwest arkansas and its people, concentrating on workforce development, regional stewardship, infrastructure, and economic development.

—
4
American Indian Center of Ark

To provide assistance to native americans in training and employment opportunities in the state of arkansas

Employment
5
North Little Rock Economic Development Corporation

Providing economic development programs to the city of north little rock, arkansas

—
6
Mississippi County Arkansas Economic Opportunity Commission Inc

Provide support, education and training for Low-Income indivuduals to help become self-sufficient and lead lives of dignity

—
7
Ozark Health Inc Van Buren Co Mem Hosp & Nursing Home

Acute care hospital, nursing home, rural health clinic, and home health agency

Health
8
Arkansas Land & Farm Development Corporation

The organization provides training and service assistance to farm development, community education programs, land retention, program management, housing, rural and community development

Food & Nutrition
9
Northeast Arkansas Regional Aids Network Dba Arkansas Supportive Svc

The organization provides housing assistance, counseling, and education to persons with aids, persons who are hiv positive, and their families and significant others as well as providing related education and training to meet the needs of…

—
10
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
11
Recovery Center of the Ozarks

To provide substance abuse counceling and services

Health
12
Arkansas Justice Collective Aiding Survivors of Trafficking and Chil

Arkansas justice collective is a nonprofit law firm serving survivors of trafficking and child abuse across arkansas and the region.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozark Regional Share and Care; the most unlike its peers is American College of Counselors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF HARRISON: $100,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF HARRISONHOUSE OF HOPE: $62,500 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPEWITTS SPRINGS COMMUNITY VOICES: $50,000 · OtherWITTS SPRINGS COMMUNITY VOICESOZARK SHARE AND CARE: $45,000 · OtherOZARK SHARE AND CAREWITTS SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 · OtherWITTS SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENTFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherCONSOLIDATED YOUTH: $15,000 · Other+23 more: $89,861 · Other+23 moreBUFFALO RIVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementOzark Regional Share and Care: $5,000 · Human ServicesOZARK ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Education
Other$402,361Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$2,500Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF COUNSELORS INC: $2,336 over 1y, 11% of budgetOZARK ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE HILLS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUFFALO RIVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Ozark Regional Share and Care ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF COUNSELORS INC ↗
  • Who funds OZARK ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roger and Patty Harness Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger and Patty Harness Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roger and Patty Harness Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph