Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$488k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.4MHealth$435kEducation$403kReligion$175kPublic Safety & Disaster$120kArts & Culture$95kFood & Nutrition$45kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $183k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DON BOSCO CENTERS$108,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEKS$75,000
BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER$30,000
DREAM FACTORY$30,000
ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY$25,000
KANSAS CITY HOSPICE$20,000
TE DEUM$20,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$20,000
KANSAS CITY GUNS N HOSES$20,000
LYRIC OPERA$20,000
SLEEPYHEAD BEDS$20,000
SANDWICHED KC$20,000
ST JAMES ACADEMY$20,000
CAMP WOOD YMCA$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KCMO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $15k → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $10k → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $10k → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $10k → 11%SLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $20k → 15%SLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $10k → 15%SLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $10k → 15%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $20k → 15%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $20k → 15%KANSAS CITY HOSPICE: $20k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $210k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $205k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $190k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $125k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $108k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 23 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$2.5M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+33%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $275k · revenue +78%
  • RU
    ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +16%
  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    4× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • KS
    KC SHEPARDS CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • AU
    AVILA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +21%
  • GP
    GORDON PARKS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
2
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
3
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.

Housing & Shelter
6
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
7
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
8
University Health Physicians

University health physicians provides quality and compassionate healthcare in an environment of academic excellence.

Health
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

—
11
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
12
Kansas Masonic Home

The kansas masonic home's mission is to provide loving care in a comfortable and safe environment. we strive to address with dignity, the mental, physical, and spiritual health of those we serve.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Poor; the most unlike its peers is Te Deum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $858,000 · Human ServicesTHE DON BOSCO CENTERSCAMP WOOD YMCA INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCAMP WOOD YMCA INCSLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $40,000 · Human ServicesLittle Sisters of The Poor: $40,000 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEKS: $175,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEKSBISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER: $135,000 · OtherBISHOP SULLIVAN CENTERSISTERS OF ST JOSEPH: $110,008 · OtherSISTERS OF ST JOSEPHST JAMES ACADEMY: $80,000 · OtherST JAMES ACADEMYCornerstones of Care: $65,000 · OtherCornerstones of CareSt Thomas Aquinas High School: $60,000 · OtherSt Thomas Aquinas High SchoolDREAM FACTORY: $55,000 · OtherDREAM FACTORYSANDWICHED KC: $30,000 · Other+15 more: $187,500 · Other+15 moreLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $275,000 · HealthLewy Body Dementi…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $140,000 · HealthThe Children's Me…ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $180,000 · EducationAVILA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY GUNSNHOSES INC: $120,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTE DEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureJerusalem Farm: $10,000 · ReligionAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$1,018,000Other$897,508Health$415,000Education$200,000Public Safety & Disaster$120,000Arts & Culture$20,000Religion$10,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $858,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $275,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $180,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY GUNSNHOSES INC: $120,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetCAMP WOOD YMCA INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $40,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTE DEUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKHILL DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJerusalem Farm: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY GUNSNHOSES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP WOOD YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds SLEEPYHEAD BEDS ↗
  • Who funds Little Sisters of The Poor ↗
  • Who funds TE DEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OAKHILL DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Kansas City Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jerusalem Farm ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Joseph M Fahey and Mary Elizabeth Rogers Fahey Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Dehaemers Family Charitable Trust · Constance M Cooper Charitable Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roderick J & Jo Anne Cyr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph