Skip to content

· Public charity

Rodale Institute

Rodale Institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to advancing regenerative organic agriculture through rigorous research, farmer training and education.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$944k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Science & Tech$1.9MEducation$310kFood & Nutrition$157kEnvironment$123kHealth$32k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $738k
  • $250k+1 grant · $944k
$71,961
Median grant
7
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMORY UNIVERSITY$943,774
UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$204,100
GEORGIA ORGANICS INC$189,785
SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE$129,513
BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM$92,122
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$71,961
MADISON GARDEN CLUB$50,157
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$34,645
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$29,567
CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION$9,567
VIGINIA ASSOC OF BIOLOGY$6,803
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CONNECT GROUP INC: $23k → 10%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%MADISON GARDEN CLUB: $516k → 11%BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $92k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $213k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $61k → 12%SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $130k → 8%CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $135k → 9%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 16%GEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $22k → 13%GEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $190k → 14%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $204k → 27%VIGINIA ASSOC OF BIOLOGY: $32k → 14%THE CONNECT GROUP INC: $18k → 10%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $33k → 16%MADISON GARDEN CLUB: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $30k → 12%SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $123k → 8%CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $10k → 9%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.2M → 14%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $63k → 27%VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF BIOLOGY: $10k → 14%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $14k → 16%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $944k → 14%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35k → 27%VIGINIA ASSOC OF BIOLOGY: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
VA
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 10 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$3.9M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+39%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2023–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +16%
  • UO
    University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $303k · revenue +28%
  • SH
    SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $252k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $213k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uga Real Estate Foundation Inc

The UGA Real Estate Foundation manages and improves various real estate assets for the benefit of the University of Georgia, governed by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. The UGA Real Estate Foundation may also…

Philanthropy
2
Clemson University Research Foundation

To generate research funding opportunities for clemson university to support research initiatives that advance university discoveries to create new products and services for public use and benefit.

Education
3
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
4
Georgia State University Research Foundation Inc

The corporation has been organized to engage in activities and pursuits which contribute to the educational, research, and service functions of georgia state university. thus, the corporation will attempt to secure gifts, contributions,…

Education
5
Georgia Southern University Research and Service Foundationinc

Assist and further research at georgia southern university

Science & Tech
6
Augusta University Research Institute Inc

Augusta university research institute, inc. (the "institute") was incorporated under the laws of the state of georgia as a nonprofit corporation on july 31, 1980. the institute qualified as a tax-exempt corporation under section 501(c)(3)…

Education
7
Georgia Tech Research Corporation

The georgia tech research corporation (gtrc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance, and economic development.

Health
8
Musc Strategic Ventures

To promote and support the educational, medical, scientific, and research purposes of the medical university of south carolina "musc", and university medical associates of the medical university of south carolina "uma", including their…

Health
9
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
The University of Memphis Research Foundation

To encourage, promote and aid the fulfillment of education, research and service functions of the university of memphis (u of m) and to encourage, promote and aid the transfer of technology generated in the course of research by u of m…

Education
12
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clemson University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Georgia Organics Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emory University: $2,121,567 · EducationEmory UniversityUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $302,744 · EducationUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation IncUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $213,243 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+2 more: $129,717 · EducationMADISON GARDEN CLUB: $565,777 · OtherMADISON GARDEN CLUBCAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $144,541 · OtherCAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP …BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $92,122 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVER…UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $90,599 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RE…NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $71,961 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVE…CONNECT GROUP INC: $40,469 · OtherSOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $252,283 · EnvironmentSOIL HEALTH …GEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $211,554 · EnvironmentGEORGIA ORGA…
Education$2,767,271Other$1,005,469Environment$463,837

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $2,121,567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $302,744 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $252,283 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $213,243 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $211,554 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $144,541 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $90,599 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $80,835 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $48,882 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rodale Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rodale Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rodale Institute?

    Find your warmest path to Rodale Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rodale Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph