Skip to content
Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade Inc

The rockville centre st.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$360kHuman Services$76kArts & Culture$73kInternational$60kYouth Development$48kEmployment$32k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $96,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $144,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$48,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REMEMBER NOLAN PROJECT$48,000
SIBS PLACE$48,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REMEMBER NOLAN PROJECT: $48k → 13%HELP INTERNATIONAL: $60k → 9%LIFE'S WORC CENTER FOR AUTISM: $41k → 6%ARMY RANGER LEAD THE WAY FUND: $35k → 6%RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION INC: $60k → 6%SIBS PLACE: $48k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $48k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$48k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANT MAKING

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ryans Love of Life Foundation
Health
2
The Nick Bales Btr Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Out On a Limb Foundation Inc
—
4
Tennis for Life

Tennis for Life Foundation is dedicated to fostering mental wellness, emotional resilience, and suicide prevention through the transformative power of tennis.

Health
5
Adam Bullen Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Concerns of Police Survivors

Support for families of officers lost

—
7
Ryan Blaney Family Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Patrick J O'connor Family Foundation Patrick J O'connor Ttee U/a Dtd 9/13/13
Unclassified
9
Healing Through Hope Inc

Healing Through Hope Inc is a support group of people learning to 'live life on life's terms' after experiencing the trauma of loss. We are unique, in that our group is for those who have experienced the Trauma of the death of a loved one.…

Health
10
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
11
Luella Hannan Memorial Foundation
—
12
The Luke O'brien Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Lives On Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Limb Kind Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesRYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATIONHELP INTERNATIONAL: $60,000 · Human ServicesHELP INTERNATIONALSIBS PLACE INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INCNMB FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesNMB FOUNDATION INCLIFE'S WORC INC: $40,500 · Human ServicesLIFE'S WORC INCLEAD THE WAY FUND INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLEAD THE WAY FUND INCBEYOND THE BADGE INC CO MICHELLE PANETTA: $72,000 · HealthBEYOND THE BADGE INC CO MICHELLE PAN…Limb Kind Foundation: $72,000 · HealthLimb Kind FoundationROCKVILLE CENTRE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $35,000 · HealthROCKVILLE CENTRE BREAST CANCER COALI…RECEPTIONS FOR RESEARCH THE GREG OLSEN FOUNDATION: $32,000 · HealthRECEPTIONS FOR RESEARCH THE GREG OLS…FAMILY LIVES ON FOUNDATION: $40,500 · OtherFAMILY LIVES ON FO…OPENING WORD PROGRAM INC: $32,000 · OtherOPENING WORD PROGR…LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $32,000 · OtherLITTLE LEAGUE BASE…IRISH AMERICAN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $40,500 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$291,500Health$211,000Other$104,500Arts & Culture$40,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEYOND THE BADGE INC CO MICHELLE PANETTA: $72,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetLimb Kind Foundation: $72,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetRYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetHELP INTERNATIONAL: $60,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNMB FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetLIFE'S WORC INC: $40,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY LIVES ON FOUNDATION: $40,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetIRISH AMERICAN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $40,500 over 1y, 36% of budgetROCKVILLE CENTRE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLEAD THE WAY FUND INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRECEPTIONS FOR RESEARCH THE GREG OLSEN FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home