· Private foundation
Rockhold Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $491k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| LETS GO BOYS AND GIRLS | $45,000 |
| BATON ROUGE YOUTH COLATION | $45,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $40,000 |
| LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDRENS RIGH | $35,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES-LA CHAPTER | $30,000 |
| ACCESS HEALTH LOUISIANA | $30,000 |
| BRAVE HEART - CHILDREN IN NEED INC | $25,000 |
| KINGDOM GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC | $22,500 |
| KIDS ORCHESTRA | $22,500 |
| KIWANIS CLUB OF CORTANA BATON ROUGE | $21,300 |
| ADULT LITERACY ADVOCATES OF GREATER | $20,000 |
| EPILEPSY ALLIANCE OF LOUISIANA | $20,000 |
| HOPE MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| METANOIA | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KKKNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC5× · 2020–2025 · $433k · revenue +156%
- BRBaton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +62%
- AHAccess Health Louisiana6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- FFFOUNDATION FOR A BETTER LOUISIANAone grant, 2020 · $107k · revenue -64%
- MCMCMAINS CHILDEN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTEone grant, 2022 · $50k
- TRTEAM RUBICON INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
To provide high quality comprehensive health care services for the under-served population of east baton rouge parish and the surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay.
Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.
Nw la food bank's mission is to be the primary resource for fighting hunger in northwest louisiana.
To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.
To offer prevention, intervention and postvention services that provide support in times of crisis and reduce the impact of suicide, homicide and violence.
Pregnancy counseling
Baton rouge children's advocacy center serves abused children and their non-offending family members. services include forensic interviews, therapy services, and a family advocacy support program.
To provide children in Southwest Louisiana facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.
To alleviate hunger in central louisiana
To monitor criminal cases in the orleans parish court systems to ensure transparency and accountability at every level and to encourage efficiency.
To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Ministries of Baton Rouge and the most unlike its peers is The Kingdom Group International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Our Lady of the Lake Foundation ↗
- Who funds KNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Access Health Louisiana ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A BETTER LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds KIDS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds THE KINGDOM GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds METANOIA INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ALLIANCE LOUISIANA frmly EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds 1031 CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds BRAVE HEART - CHILDREN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds LINE 4 LINE ↗
- Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds United Cajun Navy ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albemarle Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Shell USA Company Foundation · Irene W & Cb Pennington Private Foundation · The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · Pennington Family Foundation · The Charles Lamar Family Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · William Edwin Montan Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rockhold Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rockhold Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rockhold Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.