Skip to content

· Public charity

Rochester Economic Development Corporation

ROCHESTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (rocedc) is a private not-for-profit organization that exists to stimulate equitable economic growth that improves the quality of life in the city of rochester, new york.

$218k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$3.0MRecreation & Sports$1.3MHuman Services$381kHousing & Shelter$303kCrime & Legal$301kPublic Benefit$251kFood & Nutrition$152kEducation$146kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $208,793, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,810 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,017 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$27,986
MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$26,641
MEN OF EUREKA DEVELOPMENT LLC$25,552
THIRD EYE NETWORK LLC$18,362
LINDA'S NY PIZZERIA$15,998
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$15,000
VENTURE JOBS FOUNDATION$13,209
MARKET ACCESS COMPANY INC$13,209
JOHN RODRIGUEZ4CHANGE LLC$13,209
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC$13,209
PLAN-IT EBONI LLC$13,209
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$13,209
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $489k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $98k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $75k → 14%IBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC: $73k → 14%IBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC: $38k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $37k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $36k → 14%IBERO - AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC: $36k → 14%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC: $47k → 14%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC: $36k → 14%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
PA
CA
MO
MD
NC
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 26 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
48

Total granted

$2.6M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+28%

Still filing today

31%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VL
    VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $149k · revenue +60%
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $149k · revenue +19%
  • IBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $147k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • LT
    LAMARKETA THE INTERNATIONAL PLAZA
    one grant, 2020 · $1.3M
  • CO
    CITY OF ROCHESTER
    one grant, 2021 · $251k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SPECIALTY DBA AS BOSS SAUCE
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochesterworks Inc

The rochesterworks system stimulates local economic growth by providing outstanding employment education, support, and training services.

Employment
2
One Roc Inc

The company's mission is to create new jobs, increase regional wealth, raise regional gdp and enhance opportunity; to invest in a world-class economic development ecosystem where incumbent businesses are thriving, new firms are locating,…

Community Improvement
3
Leadership Rochester Inc

We inspire, connect, and educate a vibrant, diverse network of individuals who will provide leadership to transform and strengthen our Greater Rochester Region.

Education
4
Rochester Economic Development Corporation

Rochester economic development corporation (rocedc) is a private not-for-profit organization that exists to stimulate equitable economic growth that improves the quality of life in the city of rochester, new york.

Community Improvement
5
Greater Rochester Enterprise Inc

Gre promotes regional assets and expertise to attract new business investments and foster business growth and retention in the region. as a trusted advisor, gre connects business executives with the right people and the right resources to…

Community Improvement
6
Literacy Volunteers of Rochester Inc

Literacy volunteers of rochester, inc. is an organization that trains volunteers to improve the reading, english language, math, and digital literacy skills of adults. our trained volunteers support participants in achieving their personal…

—
7
Rochester Area Economic Development Inc

Raedi's mission is to lead and support economic, community, and workforce development initiatives that grow, and diversify the greater rochester area economy.

—
8
Regional Center for Independent Living Inc

To empower people with disabilities to self-advocate, live independently, and enhance the quality of community life. Services and programs are of an advocacy nature, seeking to overcome the barriers faced by people with disabilities who…

—
9
Rochester Accessible Adventures

To improve the health and wellness of people with disabilities by guiding communities to create a culture of physical accessibility, social inclusion and equitable access in recreation, sports and tourism. (Continued on Sch O.)We address…

Human Services
10
Rochester Management Inc

To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.

Housing & Shelter
11
Rochester Public Library Foundation

The foundation's mission is to raise private funds for educational and informational resources and projects in a manner that does not diminish the need for strong public funding, and to educate the community about the library's vital role…

Philanthropy
12
Rochester Rotary Club

We are a member-centered service organization enriching the lives of our city youth, people with disabilities and world neighbors.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Rochester Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Works Collaborative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAMARKETA THE INTERNATIONAL PLAZA: $1,300,000 · OtherLAMARKETA THE INTERNATIONAL PLAZACITY OF ROCHESTER: $251,226 · OtherAMERICAN SPECIALTY DBA AS BOSS SAUCE: $250,000 · OtherROCHESTER FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $231,700 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI DBA UMKC INNOVATION CENTER: $182,675 · Other+57 more: $2,659,462 · Other+57 moreURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $148,650 · Human ServicesURBAN LEA…IBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC: $146,650 · Human ServicesIBERO-AME…R COMMUNITY BIKES INC: $98,000 · Human ServicesR COMMUNI…Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Rochester Inc: $95,609 · Human ServicesConsumer …Greater Works Collaborative Inc: $152,650 · Crime & LegalVOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $148,650 · Crime & LegalWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $110,250 · PhilanthropyVENTURE JOBS FOUNDATION INC: $95,609 · PhilanthropyRochester Institute of Technology: $95,609 · EducationLONELY ENTREPRENEUR INC: $20,000 · EducationROCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $13,178 · EducationPeoples Institute For Survival and Beyond: $27,000 · Civil Rights19th Ward Community Association of Rochester New York Inc: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,875,063Human Services$488,909Crime & Legal$301,300Philanthropy$205,859Education$128,787Civil Rights$27,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Works Collaborative Inc: $152,650 over 3y, 61% of budgetVOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $148,650 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $148,650 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetIBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC: $146,650 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $110,250 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetR COMMUNITY BIKES INC: $98,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Rochester Inc: $95,609 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetVENTURE JOBS FOUNDATION INC: $95,609 over 3y, 23% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $95,609 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeoples Institute For Survival and Beyond: $27,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLONELY ENTREPRENEUR INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetROCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $13,178 over 1y, 0.1% of budget19th Ward Community Association of Rochester New York Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Greater Works Collaborative Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC ↗
  • Who funds IBERO-AMERICAN ACTION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds R COMMUNITY BIKES INC ↗
  • Who funds Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Rochester Inc ↗
  • Who funds VENTURE JOBS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY19.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rochester Economic Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rochester Economic Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rochester Economic Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph