Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robinson Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$837
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$674Food & Nutrition$650Housing & Shelter$400Health$300Youth Development$250Philanthropy$200Other$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF WHEELING$837
Individual grant recipient$330
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
Individual grant recipient$200
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM$200
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH$150
SOUP KITCHEN$150
SHENANDOA VALLEY BATTLEFIELD FDN$100
1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100
SEEING HAND ASSN$100
WREATH ACROSS AMERICA$50
OHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$50
WHEELING GENEALOG SOCIETY$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $200 → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $150 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
IN
OH
WV
VA
AR
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6k · 8 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$6k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+178%

Still filing today

25%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1P
    1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • SK
    SOUP KITCHEN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $550

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $362
  • S
    SOLTANA
    one grant, 2020 · $200
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Services for the Blind

To enable people who are blind or visually impaired to function independently, live full, productive lives with dignity and self-respect, and promote positive public awareness of blindness by providing individualized independent living or…

Human Services
2
Industries for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc

To create and grow employment opportunities for people who are blind or visually impaired.

Employment
3
Wheeling National Heritage Area Foundati

The exempt purpose is to support the quality of life and activity in the wheeling national heritage area through beautification projects as well as by acquiring and preserving historically significant structures.

Community Improvement
4
Visability

Provide innovative training and tools for people who are blind or visually impaired to help them achieve their goals and dreams

Human Services
5
Free Wheelchair Mission

To provide the transforming gift of mobility to people with disabilities living in developing nations as motivated by jesus christ.

Health
6
Historical Society of Western Virginia

The mission of the society is to promote an interst in the broad spectrum of history with emphasis on that of western virginia; to collect, preserve, interpret and make available materials relating to that history; to sponsor research and…

Arts & Culture
7
America On Wheels Inc

To preserve, collect and exhibit artifacts, and other artifacts pertaining to over the road transportation.

Arts & Culture
8
Alabama Historic Irownworks Commission

To preserve and promote the history of the ironworks industry in alabama and to operate two parks, which includes a historical museum.

Arts & Culture
9
Visioncorps

Empowering individuals with vision loss to attain independence.

Human Services
10
Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment Inc

To create opportunities for success and independence with people who are blind or visually impaired through vision rehabilitation services and employment.

Employment
11
Anthracite Railroads Historical Society Inc

To preserve railroad history.

—
12
Alabama Goodwill Industries Inc

Through generous donations, we strengthen communities, eliminate barriers to opportunity, and help people reach their full potential through learning and the power of work.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn; the most unlike its peers is Seeing Hand Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2,169 · Other1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $1,737 · OtherFRIENDS OF WHEELING INCSOUP KITCHEN: $550 · OtherSOUP KITCHENHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $362 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $330 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $300 · Other+20 more: $1,684 · Other+20 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $200 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $150 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 · Human ServicesWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $167 · Community ImprovementWORLD VISION INC: $100 · InternationalSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · EmploymentSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $100 · Arts & CultureAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $50 · Health
Other$7,882Human Services$450Community Improvement$167International$100Employment$100Arts & Culture$100Health$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $1,737 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $167 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Banford & Terri Exley Family Foundation Inc · Hess Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robinson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph