Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robinson Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$837
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Religion$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$674Food & Nutrition$650Housing & Shelter$400Health$300Youth Development$250Philanthropy$200Other$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$150
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF WHEELING$837
Individual grant recipient$330
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
Individual grant recipient$200
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM$200
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH$150
SOUP KITCHEN$150
1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100
SEEING HAND ASSN$100
SHENANDOA VALLEY BATTLEFIELD FDN$100
OHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$50
WREATH ACROSS AMERICA$50
WHEELING GENEALOG SOCIETY$10
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $200 → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $150 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
IN
OH
WV
VA
AR
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6k · 8 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$6k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+178%

Still filing today

25%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1P
    1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • SK
    SOUP KITCHEN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $550

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $362
  • S
    SOLTANA
    one grant, 2020 · $200
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Services for the Blind

To enable people who are blind or visually impaired to function independently, live full, productive lives with dignity and self-respect, and promote positive public awareness of blindness by providing individualized independent living or…

Human Services
2
Industries for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc

To create and grow employment opportunities for people who are blind or visually impaired.

Employment
3
Wheeling National Heritage Area Foundati

The exempt purpose is to support the quality of life and activity in the wheeling national heritage area through beautification projects as well as by acquiring and preserving historically significant structures.

Community Improvement
4
Visability

Provide innovative training and tools for people who are blind or visually impaired to help them achieve their goals and dreams

Human Services
5
Free Wheelchair Mission

To provide the transforming gift of mobility to people with disabilities living in developing nations as motivated by jesus christ.

Health
6
Historical Society of Western Virginia

The mission of the society is to promote an interst in the broad spectrum of history with emphasis on that of western virginia; to collect, preserve, interpret and make available materials relating to that history; to sponsor research and…

Arts & Culture
7
America On Wheels Inc

To preserve, collect and exhibit artifacts, and other artifacts pertaining to over the road transportation.

Arts & Culture
8
Alabama Historic Irownworks Commission

To preserve and promote the history of the ironworks industry in alabama and to operate two parks, which includes a historical museum.

Arts & Culture
9
Visioncorps

Empowering individuals with vision loss to attain independence.

Human Services
10
Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment Inc

To create opportunities for success and independence with people who are blind or visually impaired through vision rehabilitation services and employment.

Employment
11
Anthracite Railroads Historical Society Inc

To preserve railroad history.

12
Alabama Goodwill Industries Inc

Through generous donations, we strengthen communities, eliminate barriers to opportunity, and help people reach their full potential through learning and the power of work.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn and the most unlike its peers is Seeing Hand Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $2,169 · Other1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC — $1,737 · OtherFRIENDS OF WHEELING INCSOUP KITCHEN — $550 · OtherSOUP KITCHENHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $362 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $330 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $300 · Other+20 more — $1,684 · Other+20 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $200 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC — $150 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 · Human ServicesWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION — $167 · Community ImprovementWORLD VISION INC — $100 · InternationalSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION — $100 · Arts & CultureSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC — $100 · EmploymentAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $50 · Health
Other$7,882Human Services$450Community Improvement$167International$100Arts & Culture$100Employment$100Health$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC — $1,737 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION — $167 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Banford & Terri Exley Family Foundation Inc · Hess Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robinson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph