· Private foundation
Delaware National Bank of Delhi Corporate
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k52 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF BASSETT | $12,500 |
| MARGARETVILLE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| DELAWARE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY | $3,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,250 |
| HELIOS CARE | $1,800 |
| ROXBURY ARTS GROUP INC | $1,500 |
| DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOC | $1,500 |
| COLLEGE FOUNDATION DELHI INC | $1,500 |
| ONEONTA FAMILY YMCA | $1,100 |
| BRIGHT HILL PRESS | $1,000 |
| HONEST BROOK MUSIC FESTIVAL | $1,000 |
| LITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE | $1,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF DELHI INC | $500 |
| ONEONTA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $500 |
| SIDNEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFriends of Bassett Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +11%
- MHMargaretville Health Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +197%
- DVDELAWARE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF WALTON NY8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- SJST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $10k
- VOVILLAGE OF DELHI FAIR ON THE SQUAREone grant, 2017 · $7k
- WTWIRE TO SENIOR HOUSING CRIMEone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preserve and disseminate local History
To foster and perpetuate appreciation of the visual arts
Research, study, analyze, and present historical information about the town of andes, located in delaware county new york
To provide free library service to local area residents
Historical society
The delaware valley arts alliance (dvaa), founded in 1976, serves as the arts council for sullivan county, new york. dvaa presents year-round programs in the visual, performing, community arts, and provides arts resources for a county and…
Historical Society
The purpose of the Historical Society of the Town of Middletown, Delaware County is to build awareness and appreciation of the heritage of the Town by discovering, preserving and making accessible historical information and materials…
Symphonic concerts
Purchasing and maintaining fire equipment and providing fire protection for the people and businesses within the corporate limits of the Town of Delhi.
To provide the residents and visitors to the hudson valley classical ballet performances, while offering opportunities to local dancers to be part of professional productions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneonta Outlaws Baseball Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Historical Society of Middletown & Wallkill. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Friends of Bassett Inc ↗
- Who funds Margaretville Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF WALTON NY ↗
- Who funds THE ROXBURY ARTS GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN & WALLKILL ↗
- Who funds LITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds HONEST BROOK MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL AREA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC DBA HELIOS CARE ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT HILL PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOUNDATION AT DELHI INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLLIN E HAIGHT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONEONTA OUTLAWS BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Delhi Community Fund ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds WEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation Inc · Dewar Foundation Inc · Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214 · The Tom Morgan and Erna J McReynolds Charitable Foundation · The Tianaderrah Foundation (NY) · Helfgott-Renfroe Foundation Inc · The Nycm Foundation · Allstadt Hardin Foundation · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Sterling Insurance Company Foundation 008132
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Delaware National Bank of Delhi Corporate funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.