Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robins Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$351kFood & Nutrition$180kHealth$153kPhilanthropy$81kCrime & Legal$60kPublic Benefit$58kHuman Services$52kEducation$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MS HARRIET RICKENBACKSHIH TZU RESCUE INC$95,000
DR ENA MACRICROMWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS$25,000
DUP 15 Q ALLIANCE$20,000
CROSSRIDGE WELNESS CO ST BERNARDS FOUNDATION$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS$20,000
CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE$12,000
PACER CENTER$12,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$10,000
MISSION SANTA MARIA$10,000
OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO$10,000
IN THE COMPANY OF FERRETS$10,000
H O R S E OF CT$10,000
MANES & MOTIONS UNRESTRICTED CARE$10,000
CLINTON FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ACCORD: $1k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $20k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $10k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $7k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $7k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $7k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $750 → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $7k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $3k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $3k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
AR
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$951k · 22 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$951k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+19%

Still filing today

55%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    END HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $92k · revenue +48%
  • D1
    DUP 15Q ALLIANCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +90%
  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • ME
    MR ERIC RICKENBACKSHIH TZU RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TW
    THE WYNNE YELLOW JACKET FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FC
    FISHER CENTER ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
5
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
9
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
10
Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

Public Benefit
11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Mn Regional Legal Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mwendo Congo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MS HARRIET RICKENBACKSHIH TZU RESCUE INC: $252,500 · OtherMS HARRIET RICKENBACKSHIH TZU RESCUE INCIN THE COMPANY OF FERRETS INC: $58,750 · OtherIN THE COMPANY OF FERRETS INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $52,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDR ENA MACRICROMWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $33,000 · OtherDR ENA MACRICROMWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLSH O R S E OF CT: $31,000 · OtherMR ERIC RICKENBACKSHIH TZU RESCUE INC: $20,000 · OtherCROSSRIDGE WELNESS CO ST BERNARDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION RAPTOR CENTER: $19,500 · Other+17 more: $95,750 · Other+17 moreDUP 15Q ALLIANCE: $82,250 · HealthDUP 15Q ALLIANCEBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $77,500 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CH…+2 more: $3,500 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $67,500 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FO…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50,500 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesEND HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC: $92,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEND HUNGER…OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $19,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC: $8,750 · Arts & CulturePACER CENTER INC: $27,500 · Civil RightsMISSION SANTA MARIA: $18,000 · Education
Other$582,500Health$163,250Human Services$119,000Public Safety & Disaster$92,000Arts & Culture$28,250Civil Rights$27,500Education$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEND HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC: $92,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetDUP 15Q ALLIANCE: $82,250 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $77,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS: $67,500 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPACER CENTER INC: $27,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $19,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $19,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $19,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION SANTA MARIA: $18,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC: $8,750 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMINNESOTA BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCORD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN MN REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMWENDO CONGO: $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds END HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds DUP 15Q ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PACER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION SANTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Higher Purpose Hub ↗
  • Who funds ACCORD ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN MN REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MWENDO CONGO ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robins Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robins Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robins Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robins Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robins Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph