Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert M Lauman Charitable Fnd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$160kArts & Culture$97kAnimals$89kYouth Development$38kRecreation & Sports$33kHuman Services$31kFood & Nutrition$14kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHREINERS HOSPITAL$15,000
THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF$15,000
LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FDN$12,000
GRETNA THEATRE$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE DWIGHT D EISENHOWER SOCIETY$8,146
BRIDGE YOUTH CENTER OF EPHRATA$8,000
FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY$7,500
LITITZ REC CENTER$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,000
A GIFT OF SMILES$7,000
CONESTOGA VALLEY CHRISTIAN COMMUNIT$6,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF COCALICO VLY$5,000
VISION CORPS$5,000
KPETS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%A GIFT OF SMILES: $7k → 8%CONESTOGA VALLEY CHRISTIAN COMMUNIT: $6k → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $1k → 9%VISION CORPS: $10k → 9%VISION CORPS: $10k → 9%VISION CORPS: $10k → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $10k → 9%VISION CORPS: $5k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $8k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $8k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $8k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $8k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $8k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $5k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $5k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $5k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$497k · 20 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$497k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+65%

Still filing today

45%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    VISIONCORPS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +34%
  • DD
    DWIGHT D EISENHOWER SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +82%
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +65%
  • WS
    WATER STREET MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster County Council of the Arts

To enrich the quality of life in Lancaster County by building vibrant and inclusive communities connecting arts, culture, education, and economic vitality.

Arts & Culture
2
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
3
Central Market Trust

The organization performs the daily management of the lancaster central market in a manner that facilitates the economic health of standholders' businesses while remaining consistent with traditional market and historic preservation…

—
4
Children's Museum of Lancaster

The children's museum of lancaster (hands-on-house) has the following mission: creating landmark learning experiences for children and their families through play.

Arts & Culture
5
Eastern Lancaster County Library

The library's mission is to provide free access to information, education, technology, services and enterrainment to facilitate an informed society. the vision of the library is to be highly valued community source of information,…

—
6
Lancaster Science Center

To inspire curiosity, creativity, and confidence by fostering an inclusive environment for hands-on stem exploration. we actively seek to make our facility and educational programs accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
7
Lancaster Preschool

Lancaster preschool believes that the preschool is an extension of the home environment where children can learn new skills, interact with teachers and peers, and experience hands-on learning opportunities through developmentally…

Education
8
The Community Library Inc

The lancaster community library is a center for the cultural, intellectual, and recreational pursuits of the community. through its materials, programs, and services, the library promotes literacy, provides lifetime learning opportunities,…

Education
9
Economic and Community Growth Corporation of Lycoming County

To perform charitable, literacy, scientific, religious, and educational activities in order to promote economic and community development within the greater williamsport and lycoming county areas.

Community Improvement
10
Danville Child Development Center

Danville child development center is a community based organization dedicated to giving children a strong foundation for lifelong success by providing supports to families and high quality early learning experiences in safe, nurturing and…

Human Services
11
Lancaster Emergency Medical Services Association

To provide comprehensive, skillful, cost effective emergency and non- emergency health care services to the lancaster community while continuing to evolve with changing health care needs.

Health
12
Child Development Council of Northeastern Pa Inc

The child development council of northeastern pa, inc. was established to provide child care and nutritional services to working families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Street Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Original Mount Gretna Cicada Music Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRETNA THEATRE: $54,000 · OtherGRETNA THEATRESHREINERS HOSPITAL: $52,500 · OtherSHREINERS HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF: $50,000 · OtherTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFBRIDGE YOUTH CENTER OF EPHRATA: $36,000 · OtherBRIDGE YOUTH CENTER OF EPHRATAKPETS: $17,500 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherLEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $12,500 · Other+8 more: $40,000 · Other+8 moreVISIONCORPS: $35,000 · Human ServicesVISIONCORPSLITITZ COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesLITITZ COMMUNITY CENTER…FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITYWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Human ServicesWATER STREET MINISTRIESA GIFT OF SMILES: $7,000 · Human ServicesA GIFT OF SMILESCONESTOGA VALLEY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,500 · PhilanthropyLANCASTER …WARWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11,500 · PhilanthropyWARWICK ED…DWIGHT D EISENHOWER SOCIETY: $27,146 · Arts & CultureORIGINAL MOUNT GRETNA CICADA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE COCALICO VALLEY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMusic for Everyone: $2,500 · Arts & CultureZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $11,500 · AnimalsTNT YOUTH MINISTRY: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$344,000Human Services$117,000Philanthropy$53,000Arts & Culture$40,646Animals$11,500Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetVISIONCORPS: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLITITZ COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDWIGHT D EISENHOWER SOCIETY: $27,146 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORIGINAL MOUNT GRETNA CICADA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCONESTOGA VALLEY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE COCALICO VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTNT YOUTH MINISTRY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER PACKS PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VISIONCORPS ↗
  • Who funds LITITZ COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT D EISENHOWER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WARWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds A GIFT OF SMILES ↗
  • Who funds ORIGINAL MOUNT GRETNA CICADA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONESTOGA VALLEY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE COCALICO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Music for Everyone ↗
  • Who funds TNT YOUTH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Kalas Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · The Steinman Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert M Lauman Charitable Fnd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert M Lauman Charitable Fnd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert M Lauman Charitable Fnd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph