Skip to content

· Public charity

Robert M Hearin Support Foundation

To provide support through grants to specified educational institutions and public charities.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$72MArts & Culture$5.1M
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $933k
  • $250k+4 grants · $13M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$235M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$8,681,590
Individual grant recipient$2,987,500
MS MUSEUM OF ART$1,025,000
MS COLLEGE$250,000
MILLSAPS COLLEGE$216,689
DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY$125,000
MS UNIV FOR WOMEN$110,000
JACKSON STATE UNIV$100,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE$100,000
UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS$100,000
Individual grant recipient$81,425
TOUGALOO COLLEGE$50,000
WILLIAM CAREY UNIV$50,000
MS OPERA$43,670
MS VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$37,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 20%BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $300k → 16%UNIV OF MS: $8.7M → 18%MS UNIV FOR WOMEN: $130k → 19%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $623k → 22%MS COLLEGE: $250k → 23%MS STATE UNIV: $3.8M → 24%DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $682k → 29%BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $200k → 16%UNIV OF MS: $7.2M → 18%MS UNIV FOR WOMEN: $113k → 19%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $394k → 22%MS COLLEGE: $100k → 23%MS STATE UNIV: $3.7M → 24%DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $634k → 29%BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $100k → 16%UNIV OF MS: $6.8M → 18%MS UNIV FOR WOMEN: $110k → 19%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $310k → 22%MS STATE UNIV: $3.6M → 24%DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $503k → 29%UNIV OF MS: $6.6M → 18%MS UNIV FOR WOMEN: $110k → 19%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $275k → 22%MS STATE UNIV: $3.5M → 24%DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $140k → 29%UNIV OF MS: $6.3M → 18%MS UNIV FOR WOMEN: $90k → 19%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $140k → 22%MS STATE UNIV: $3.1M → 24%DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $125k → 29%UNIV OF MS: $6.3M → 18%UNIV OF SOUTHERN MS: $100k → 22%MS STATE UNIV: $3.0M → 24%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $1.0M → 23%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $896k → 23%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $855k → 23%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $835k → 23%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $800k → 23%MS MUSEUM OF ART: $700k → 23%JACKSON STATE UNIV: $120k → 23%JACKSON STATE UNIV: $100k → 23%JACKSON STATE UNIV: $80k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $452k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $292k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $257k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $217k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $217k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $115k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77M · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$77M
$0

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Millsaps College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +9%
  • BM
    BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $710k · revenue +43%
  • WC
    William Carey University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $206k · revenue +60%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Individual grant recipient: $41,828,230 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,666,704 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMS MUSEUM OF ART: $5,110,500 · OtherMS MUSEUM OF ART+10 more: $6,523,832 · Other+10 moreMillsaps College: $1,547,995 · EducationBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $710,000 · EducationBelhaven University: $197,000 · EducationTougaloo College: $160,000 · EducationRUST COLLEGE: $135,000 · Education
    Other$74,129,266Education$2,749,995

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMillsaps College: $1,547,995 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $710,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWilliam Carey University: $206,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBelhaven University: $197,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTougaloo College: $160,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRUST COLLEGE: $135,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Millsaps College ↗
    • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds William Carey University ↗
    • Who funds Belhaven University ↗
    • Who funds Tougaloo College ↗
    • Who funds RUST COLLEGE ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Robert M Hearin FoundationMS17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Robert M Hearin Foundation · Phil Hardin Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Robert M Hearin Support Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert M Hearin Support Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Robert M Hearin Support’s filings →

      More from the funding graph