Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Leerink Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$33kRecreation & Sports$24kHealth$20kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$12kAnimals$6kCommunity Improvement$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAM NEW ENGLAND$10,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER OF MA$5,000
THAYER ACADEMY$3,500
COREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATION$1,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,250
OTHER$1,100
NVNA$1,000
TUSCALOOSA METRO ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
BABSON COLLEGE$1,000
SCITUATE ANIMAL SHELTER$500
HINGHAM UNITY COUNCIL$500
DANA FARBER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%WELLSPRING: $1k → 10%WELLSPRING: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CO
VA
MD
TN
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$95k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+25%

Still filing today

36%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthEmploymentPhilanthropyAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CAMP BAUERCREST INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +58%
  • BABSON COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +43%
  • WI
    WELLSPRING INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • TF
    THE FREEMAN CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
10
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Thayer Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metro Animal Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER OF MA: $32,756 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER OF MAOTHER: $17,837 · OtherOTHERCAMP BAUERCREST INC: $13,850 · OtherCAMP BAUERCREST INCEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONTEAM NEW ENGLAND: $10,000 · OtherTEAM NEW ENGLANDCONQUER CANCER: $7,000 · OtherCONQUER CANCERSCITUATE ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $19,720 · Other+15 moreBABSON COLLEGE: $5,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $3,500 · EducationALRAY TAYLOR SECOND CHANCE SCHOLARSHIP FUND CORPORATION: $1,000 · EducationChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $350 · HealthWELLSPRING INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSUMMER SEARCH: $1,000 · EmploymentMETRO ANIMAL SHELTER: $1,000 · AnimalsNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $499 · Philanthropy
Other$116,163Education$10,000Health$6,350Human Services$2,000Employment$1,000Animals$1,000Philanthropy$499

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP BAUERCREST INC: $13,850 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALRAY TAYLOR SECOND CHANCE SCHOLARSHIP FUND CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $1,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO ANIMAL SHELTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $499 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP BAUERCREST INC ↗
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALRAY TAYLOR SECOND CHANCE SCHOLARSHIP FUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Leerink Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Leerink Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Wellspring Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert Leerink’s filings →

More from the funding graph