Skip to content
Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$859k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$2.5MHealth$2.4MHousing & Shelter$1.1MHuman Services$713kEnvironment$179kYouth Development$152kEmployment$109kEducation$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $705k
$46,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I Am You 360$100,000
Honor Health Foundation$100,000
Banner Health Foundation$100,000
I Am You 360$80,000
Valleywise Health Foundation$80,000
Circle the City$65,000
Central Arizona Shelter Services$65,000
Community Bridges Inc$65,000
Phoenix Zoo$50,000
I Am You 360$46,000
AZ National Livestock Show$26,000
AZ National Livestock Show$16,500
Fostering Heroes Foundation$15,000
Homeless Youth Connection$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $562k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%I Am You 360: $100k → 15%I Am You 360: $80k → 15%I Am You 360: $46k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $25k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $13k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $10k → 15%Circle the City: $65k → 11%Circle the City: $50k → 11%Circle the City: $19k → 11%Circle the City: $15k → 11%Fostering Heroes Foundation: $15k → 11%OCJ Kids: $10k → 11%Soldier's Best Friend: $10k → 11%Soldier's Best Friend: $10k → 11%Soldier's Best Friend: $10k → 11%Hushabye Nursery: $50k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $20k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 22 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$6.4M
$635k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+36%

Still filing today

82%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Banner Health Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $850k · revenue +99%
  • CA
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $414k · revenue +82%
  • AN
    ARIZONA NATIONAL LIVESTOCK SHOW INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $328k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • HS
    Human Services Campus Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue ×19
  • D
    Devereux
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • PC
    Phoenix Children's Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
2
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
3
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
4
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
5
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
6
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
7
Our Family Services Inc

Our Family's mission is to eliminate homelessness and strengthen our community. We do this by providing stability in times of crisis, linking people to support and resources, supporting social connectedness, engaging our neighbors to…

—
8
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
9
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
10
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
11
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
12
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is I Am You 360. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Phoenix Zoo: $2,182,000 · OtherPhoenix ZooValley Hope Association Foundation: $557,275 · OtherValley Hope Association FoundationSTAR - Stand Together and Recover C: $301,000 · OtherSTAR - Stand Together and Recover C+12 more: $463,297 · Other+12 moreBanner Health Foundation: $850,000 · HealthBanner Health FoundationHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $455,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $305,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATIONA NEW LEAF: $160,000 · HealthA NEW LEAFPhoenix Children's Hospital: $100,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $90,000 · Health+3 more: $75,000 · HealthCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $413,750 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL A…Human Services Campus Inc: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterHuman Ser…FLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterFLAGSTAFF…ARIZONA HOUSING INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterI Am You 360: $226,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CITY: $148,750 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURSERY: $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $47,500 · Human ServicesGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA NATIONAL LIVESTOCK SHOW INC: $328,102 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $80,000 · ReligionDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $50,000 · ReligionHOMELESS ID PROJECT INC: $20,000 · ReligionHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $92,500 · Youth DevelopmentARIZONA 4-H YOUTH FOUNDATION: $44,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,503,572Health$2,035,000Housing & Shelter$613,750Human Services$562,250Food & Nutrition$331,602Religion$150,000Youth Development$136,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBanner Health Foundation: $850,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $455,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $413,750 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetARIZONA NATIONAL LIVESTOCK SHOW INC: $328,102 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $305,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetI Am You 360: $226,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $160,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $148,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $92,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $91,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $80,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker: $68,750 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $63,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $47,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC: $27,775 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetARIZONA HOUSING INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE BOARD OF VISITORS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOCJ KIDS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWickenburg Community Hospital Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesVirginia G Piper Char…The Foundation for Co…Garcia Family Foundat…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…The Kemper & Ethel Ma…The Diane and Bruce H…BHHS Legacy FoundationValley of the Sun Uni…John F Long Foundatio…The Board of Visitors
Arizona Community FoundationAZ41× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Garcia Family Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Board of Visitors

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Kemper Corrigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home