Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert Herman Storz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$452k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$944kEducation$398kPhilanthropy$209kYouth Development$174kHealth$158kHuman Services$103kFood & Nutrition$100kEnvironment$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$50,185
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$50,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLAND$30,000
LAURITZEN GARDENS$25,000
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$25,000
DURHAM MUSEUM$25,000
COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST$25,000
VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY$25,000
BELLEVUE UNIVERSITY$25,000
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$20,000
CHILDREN'S NEBRASKA$20,000
OMAHA SYMPHONY$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS - MIDLANDS$15,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $25k → 12%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 76% of Robert Herman Storz Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NE; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Robert Herman Storz Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 40 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
11

Total granted

$2.3M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+40%

Still filing today

53%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2025 · $205k · revenue +174%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $96k · revenue +14%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $80k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • OP
    OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +165%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • JE
    JAMES E WEST FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
2
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
3
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

4
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
5
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
8
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
9
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

10
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Nebraska Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vita Nova Maternity Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr17%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%4%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr12%31%35–55yr17%48%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
11%
388/3,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS — $225,000 · OtherOMAHA PERFORMING ARTSLAURITZEN GARDENS — $186,000 · OtherLAURITZEN GARDENSOMAHA SYMPHONY — $110,000 · OtherOMAHA SYMPHONYUNITED WAY — $100,000 · OtherUNITED WAYUNVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherUNVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE — $65,000 · OtherOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSEOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY — $50,000 · Other+24 more — $337,123 · Other+24 moreJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $205,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUMHERITAGE SERVICES — $150,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE SERVICESTHE DURHAM MUSEUM — $140,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MUSEUMOmaha Children's Museum — $27,500 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $192,895 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Bellevue University — $51,000 · EducationBellevue Univ…COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST — $50,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY INF…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $96,300 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentJAMES E WEST FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER — $40,000 · HealthRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC — $36,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthOUTLOOK ENRICHMENT — $20,000 · HealthKICKS FOR A CURE INC — $12,500 · HealthUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $80,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $70,000 · Animals
Other$1,203,123Arts & Culture$522,500Education$293,895Youth Development$159,300Health$138,500Philanthropy$81,000Animals$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $205,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $192,895 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE SERVICES — $150,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM — $140,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $96,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE — $65,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBellevue University — $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY — $50,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC — $36,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum — $27,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOUTLOOK ENRICHMENT — $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJAMES E WEST FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC — $12,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC — $11,118 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MIDLANDS INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOUTLOOK-NEBRASKA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION — $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HERITAGE SERVICES
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Bellevue University
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST
  • Who funds VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Omaha Children's Museum
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
  • Who funds OUTLOOK ENRICHMENT
  • Who funds JAMES E WEST FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Dr C C and Mabel L Criss Memorial · Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation · John K & Lynne D Boyer Foundation · Parker Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert Herman Storz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert Herman Storz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert Herman Storz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph