Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Herman Storz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$452k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$944kEducation$398kPhilanthropy$209kYouth Development$174kHealth$158kHuman Services$103kFood & Nutrition$100kEnvironment$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$50,185
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$50,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLAND$30,000
BELLEVUE UNIVERSITY$25,000
DURHAM MUSEUM$25,000
COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST$25,000
VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY$25,000
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$25,000
LAURITZEN GARDENS$25,000
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$20,000
CHILDREN'S NEBRASKA$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS - MIDLANDS$15,000
OMAHA SYMPHONY$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $25k → 12%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 76% of Robert Herman Storz Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 24%.

Robert Herman Storz Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 40 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
11

Total granted

$2.3M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+40%

Still filing today

53%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2025 · $205k · revenue +174%
  • TD
    THE DURHAM MUSEUM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $140k · revenue +0%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $96k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • OP
    OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +165%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • JE
    JAMES E WEST FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
2
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
3
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
4
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
5
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
8
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
9
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
10
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Nebraska Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vita Nova Maternity Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $225,000 · OtherOMAHA PERFORMING ARTSLAURITZEN GARDENS: $186,000 · OtherLAURITZEN GARDENSOMAHA SYMPHONY: $110,000 · OtherOMAHA SYMPHONYUNITED WAY: $100,000 · OtherUNITED WAYUNVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherUNVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $65,000 · OtherOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSEOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $50,000 · Other+24 more: $337,123 · Other+24 moreJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $205,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUMHERITAGE SERVICES: $150,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE SERVICESTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $140,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MUSEUMOmaha Children's Museum: $27,500 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $192,895 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Bellevue University: $51,000 · EducationBellevue Univ…COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $50,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY INF…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $96,300 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentJAMES E WEST FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $40,000 · HealthRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $36,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthOUTLOOK ENRICHMENT: $20,000 · HealthKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $12,500 · HealthUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $80,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $70,000 · Animals
Other$1,203,123Arts & Culture$522,500Education$293,895Youth Development$159,300Health$138,500Philanthropy$81,000Animals$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $205,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $192,895 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE SERVICES: $150,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $140,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $96,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $65,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBellevue University: $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $50,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $36,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum: $27,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOUTLOOK ENRICHMENT: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES E WEST FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $11,118 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MIDLANDS INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOUTLOOK-NEBRASKA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bellevue University ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds OUTLOOK ENRICHMENT ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JAMES E WEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Dr C C and Mabel L Criss Memorial · Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation · John K & Lynne D Boyer Foundation · Parker Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Herman Storz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Herman Storz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert Herman Storz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert Herman Storz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Herman Storz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph