Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert F & Valerie Wright Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$159kHealth$24kHuman Services$18kRecreation & Sports$12kCivil Rights$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kFood & Nutrition$2kEnvironment$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$578k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LITTLE PEOPLE OF AMERICA GARDEN STATE CHAPTER$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
PARALYZED VERTERANS OF AMERICA$500
GUADALUPE CENTER$500
MONMOUTH DAY CARE CENTER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
JUDICIAL WATCH$500
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$250
CATHOLIC EXTENSION$250
VFW$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $250 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER: $500 → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $500 → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $500 → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $500 → 10%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $3k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $500 → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $500 → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $250 → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $200 → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $70 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 36 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
25

Total granted

$197k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+39%

Still filing today

39%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +5%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +74%
  • MC
    MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550 · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • MU
    MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY LEON HESS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSY
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • PI
    PORT IN THE STORM
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYSPECIAL OLYMPICS: $12,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICSLITTLE PEOPLE OF AMERICA GARDEN STATE CHAPTER: $11,200 · OtherLITTLE PEOPLE OF AMERICA GARDEN STATE CHAPTERIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $7,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $6,750 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $6,000 · Other+35 more: $34,845 · Other+35 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $45,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC+1 more: $355 · EducationFamily and Children's Services Inc: $6,420 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $1,500 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $700 · HealthAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $600 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $400 · Health+3 more: $200 · HealthMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $550 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $300 · EnvironmentJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 · Public BenefitPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $250 · Public BenefitK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $200 · AnimalsMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $110 · Arts & Culture
Other$178,295Education$60,355Human Services$9,420Health$3,900Environment$850Public Benefit$750Animals$200Arts & Culture$110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily and Children's Services Inc: $6,420 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH DAY CARE CENTER INC: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KORTNEY ROSE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $355 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GLAUCOMA SOCIETY: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Family and Children's Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE KORTNEY ROSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kroon Foundation IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kroon Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert F & Valerie Wright Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert F & Valerie Wright Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Family and Children's Services Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
  • Monmouth Day Care Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert F & Valerie Wright Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert F & Valerie Wright Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert F & Valerie Wright’s filings →

More from the funding graph