Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert Cummins Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$56kHealth$15kReligion$12kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$6kRecreation & Sports$6kPublic Benefit$5kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$487k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION$2,700
ABOUNDING GRACE MINISTRIES$2,000
ENID TENNIS ASSOCIATION$1,000
LOAVES & FISHES$1,000
4RKIDS$1,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
BENNIE'S BARN INC$1,000
WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK$1,000
YWCA$500
YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$500
GREATER ENID ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC: $23k → 16%WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC: $10k → 16%WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC: $9k → 16%YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 16%YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 16%YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 16%WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK: $1k → 16%YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$103k · 14 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$103k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
0%

Still filing today

43%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +77% · 37% of their budget
  • 4K
    4R Kids Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +57%
  • YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • EC
    ENID CHARITY BALL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • EC
    Enid Community Clinic
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -10%
  • GT
    Gaslight Theatre
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
3
Enid Community Theatre Inc

To provide a wide spectrum of high quality theatrical entertainment to a broad audience in Enid and the surrounding communities, and to provide a setting for nonprofessional actors, directors, designers, and technicians to learn and…

Arts & Culture
4
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
5
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
6
Fort Osage National Historic Landmark Association

Education

Philanthropy
7
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
8
Oklahoma Cowboys Charitable Foundation

Education, preservation, outreach, & agriculture of black cowboys in oklahoma history.

Community Improvement
9
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
10
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
11
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
12
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth and Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Enter His Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC — $43,000 · Human ServicesWOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INCYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCABOUNDING GRACE MINISTRIES — $11,000 · OtherABOUNDING GRACE MINISTRIESADAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $6,000 · OtherADAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLLOAVES & FISHES — $6,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHESSALVATION ARMY — $5,250 · OtherSALVATION ARMYWOUNDED VETERANS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $5,000 · OtherWOUNDED VETERANS OF OKLAHOMA INCYWCA — $3,250 · OtherYWCAENID TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · OtherENID TENNIS ASSOCIATIONENID CHARITY BALL — $2,500 · OtherENID CHARITY BALL+6 more — $3,200 · Other+6 moreBennie's Barn Inc — $3,500 · HealthNORTHWEST OKLAHOMA OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION — $2,700 · HealthEnid Community Clinic — $2,000 · Health4R Kids Foundation — $7,000 · PhilanthropySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationThe Forgotten Church Inc — $1,250 · ReligionEnter His Gates Foundation — $250 · Youth Development
Human Services$47,500Other$45,200Health$8,200Philanthropy$7,000Education$4,000Religion$1,250Youth Development$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC — $43,000 over 4y, 37% of budget4R Kids Foundation — $7,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBennie's Barn Inc — $3,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHWEST OKLAHOMA OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION — $2,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEnid Community Clinic — $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Forgotten Church Inc — $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER ENID ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL — $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODRING WALL OF HONOR AND VETERANS PARK INC
  • Who funds 4R Kids Foundation
  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Bennie's Barn Inc
  • Who funds NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Enid Community Clinic
  • Who funds The Forgotten Church Inc
  • Who funds GREATER ENID ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL
  • Who funds Enter His Gates Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Oklahoma Osteopathic FoundationOK15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Oklahoma Osteopathic Foundation · Park Avenue Thrift Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert Cummins Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph