Skip to content
Robert C White School Boy Rowing at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert C White School Boy Rowing

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$159kEducation$72k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$694k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILADELPHIA CITY ROWING$15,000
RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB$5,000
CONCORD ROWING CLUB$4,000
WILMINGTON YOUTH ROWING ASSOCIATION$4,000
DOANE ACADEMY$4,000
CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%WILMINGTON YOUTH ROWING ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $6k → 6%PHILADELPHIA CITY ROWING: $15k → 7%FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $10k → 10%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $11k → 22%DOANE ACADEMY: $4k → 7%CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON: $2k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $5k → 6%PHILADELPHIA CITY ROWING: $15k → 7%FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $10k → 10%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $11k → 22%CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON: $2k → 10%RADNOR CREW CLUB INC: $5k → 6%PHILADELPHIA CITY ROWING: $10k → 7%FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $5k → 10%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $9k → 22%CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILIMINGTON: $2k → 10%RADNOR CREW CLUB INC: $5k → 6%UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6k → 7%FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $5k → 10%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $7k → 22%CONCORD ROWING CLUB: $4k → 10%RADNOR CREW CLUB INC: $5k → 6%UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW: $5k → 10%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $3k → 22%CONCORD ROWING CLUB: $3k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $4k → 6%UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 7%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $5k → 22%Concord Rowing Club: $3k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $4k → 6%CONCORD ROWING CLUB: $3k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $4k → 6%CONCORD ROWING CLUB: $3k → 10%RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $2k → 6%CONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $7k → 6%CONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $6k → 6%CONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $6k → 6%CONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$210k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+3%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +18%
  • PC
    Philadelphia City Rowing Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +74%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING
    4× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • GF
    GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTD
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -60%
  • UR
    UNIONVILLE ROWING CLUB INC
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Allegheny Rowing Association

Amateur rowing association

Recreation & Sports
2
Sooner Rowing Association
—
3
Eugene Rowing Club

Eugene Rowing Club strives to build a team-oriented program. Our student athletesdevelop personal character, time management skills, an ethic of cooperation, and physical fitness with a team culture of crew and rowing. Athletes learn to…

Recreation & Sports
4
Moorestown Rowing Club Inc

Moorestown rowing club is a rowing program for students in 7-12 grade from any town in the south jersey and se pa area. we offer both recreational camps and opportunities to race competitively, both locally and nationally.

Recreation & Sports
5
Friends of Pwhs Rowing

Support a rowing program at Plymouth Whitemarsh High School

Recreation & Sports
6
Haddonfield Crew Club

To support youth rowing.

Education
7
Ihs Crew Boosters

IHS Crew Boosters is a booster club formed to support our school district's crew team.

Recreation & Sports
8
Toledo Rowing Club

Member of us rowing organization

Recreation & Sports
9
James River Rowers

To operate and fund high school rowing team.

Recreation & Sports
10
Upper St Clair Rowing Association

Support of the Upper St. Clair High School and Middle School Rowing Teams

Recreation & Sports
11
James Madison Crew Boosters

High school rowing club

Education
12
Blair Crew Inc

coed, parent-supported club team that rows in the fall and spring

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unionville Rowing Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Springside Chestnut Hill Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Philadelphia City Rowing Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsPhiladelphia City Rowing IncRADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $25,200 · Recreation & SportsRADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUBCONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $23,500 · Recreation & SportsCONESTOGA CREW CLUBCONCORD ROWING CLUB: $14,500 · Recreation & SportsCONCORD ROWING CLUBRADNOR CREW CLUB INC: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsRADNOR CREW CLUB INC+1 more: $3,880 · Recreation & SportsSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $41,100 · EducationSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMYFRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $29,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWINGCHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC: $6,000 · EducationCHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INCFRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTD: $4,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTDUPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,700 · OtherUPPER MERION…GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherGERMANTOWN F…Doane Academy: $4,000 · OtherDoane Academ…WILMINGTON YOUTH ROWING ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · Crime & Legal
Recreation & Sports$121,080Education$81,100Other$24,700Crime & Legal$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $41,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPhiladelphia City Rowing Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING: $29,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetRADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB: $25,200 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetCONESTOGA CREW CLUB: $23,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetRADNOR CREW CLUB INC: $14,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC: $6,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTD: $4,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetDoane Academy: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIONVILLE ROWING CLUB INC: $3,880 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert C White School Boy Rowing funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert C White School Boy Rowing. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Charter School of Wilmington Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert C White School Boy Rowing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home