· Private foundation
Robert C White School Boy Rowing
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHILADELPHIA CITY ROWING | $15,000 |
| RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB | $5,000 |
| DOANE ACADEMY | $4,000 |
| WILMINGTON YOUTH ROWING ASSOCIATION | $4,000 |
| CONCORD ROWING CLUB | $4,000 |
| CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY5× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +18%
- PCPhiladelphia City Rowing Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +74%
- FOFRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING4× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- GFGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $5k
- FOFRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTDone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -42%
- URUNIONVILLE ROWING CLUB INCone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Amateur rowing association
Eugene Rowing Club strives to build a team-oriented program. Our student athletesdevelop personal character, time management skills, an ethic of cooperation, and physical fitness with a team culture of crew and rowing. Athletes learn to…
Moorestown rowing club is a rowing program for students in 7-12 grade from any town in the south jersey and se pa area. we offer both recreational camps and opportunities to race competitively, both locally and nationally.
Support a rowing program at Plymouth Whitemarsh High School
To support youth rowing.
IHS Crew Boosters is a booster club formed to support our school district's crew team.
Member of us rowing organization
To operate and fund high school rowing team.
Support of the Upper St. Clair High School and Middle School Rowing Teams
High school rowing club
coed, parent-supported club team that rows in the fall and spring
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unionville Rowing Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Springside Chestnut Hill Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia City Rowing Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HAVERFORD SCHOOL ROWING ↗
- Who funds RADNOR GIRLS CREW CLUB ↗
- Who funds CONESTOGA CREW CLUB ↗
- Who funds CONCORD ROWING CLUB ↗
- Who funds RADNOR CREW CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HARRITON CREW LTD ↗
- Who funds WILMINGTON YOUTH ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Doane Academy ↗
- Who funds UNIONVILLE ROWING CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert C White School Boy Rowing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Charter School of Wilmington Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.